International journal of cardiology · 2017
Impact of nutritional assessment and body mass index on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kunimura Ayako, Ishii Hideki, Uetani Tadayuki, Aoki Toshijirou, Harada Kazuhiro, Hirayama Kenshi, Negishi Yosuke, Shibata Yohei, Sumi Takuya, Kawashima Kazuhiro, Tatami Yosuke, Kawamiya Toshiki, Yamamoto Dai, Suzuki Susumu, Amano Tetsuya, Murohara Toyoaki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An inverse association between obesity, as defined by body mass index (BMI) and prognosis has been reported in patients with cardiovascular disease ("obesity paradox"). The aim of this study was to investigate whether adding nutritional information to BMI provides better risk assessment in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHOD: This study comprised 1004 patients undergoing elective PCI. We calculated each patient's controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for nutritional screening at baseline. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on CONUT score (low, 0-1 [<75th percentile]; or high, ≥2 [≥75th percentile]) and BMI (normal, 18.5-24.9kg/m2; or high, ≥25kg/m2). The endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as cardiac death and/or myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: Low CONUT score+normal BMI, low CONUT score+high BMI, high CONUT score+normal BMI, and high CONUT score+high BMI were determined in 374, 242, 275, and 113 patients, respectively. During a median follow-up of 1779 days, 73 events occurred. High CONUT score+normal BMI showed a 2.72-fold increase in the incidence of MACE (95% CI 1.46-5.08, p=0.002) compared with low CONUT score+normal BMI after adjusting for confounding factors. On the other hand, no significant difference in the incidence of MACE was observed in the other three groups.
CONCLUSION: The combination of CONUT score and BMI was a useful predictor of MACE in this population. Using BMI to assess the cardiovascular risk may be misleading unless the nutritional information is considered.
METHOD: This study comprised 1004 patients undergoing elective PCI. We calculated each patient's controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for nutritional screening at baseline. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on CONUT score (low, 0-1 [<75th percentile]; or high, ≥2 [≥75th percentile]) and BMI (normal, 18.5-24.9kg/m2; or high, ≥25kg/m2). The endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as cardiac death and/or myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: Low CONUT score+normal BMI, low CONUT score+high BMI, high CONUT score+normal BMI, and high CONUT score+high BMI were determined in 374, 242, 275, and 113 patients, respectively. During a median follow-up of 1779 days, 73 events occurred. High CONUT score+normal BMI showed a 2.72-fold increase in the incidence of MACE (95% CI 1.46-5.08, p=0.002) compared with low CONUT score+normal BMI after adjusting for confounding factors. On the other hand, no significant difference in the incidence of MACE was observed in the other three groups.
CONCLUSION: The combination of CONUT score and BMI was a useful predictor of MACE in this population. Using BMI to assess the cardiovascular risk may be misleading unless the nutritional information is considered.