European journal of neurology · 2025
High Agreement Across Laboratories Between Different Alpha-Synuclein Seed Amplification Protocols.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bräuer Stefan, Weber Maximilian, Deuschle Christian, Julia Kühlwein, Concha-Marambio Luis, Bernhardt Alexander M, Kadam Vaibhavi, Mengel David, Ruf Wolfgang P, Kassubek Jan, Schniewind Iñaki, Kuhs Sandra, Rossi Marcello, Parchi Piero, Levin Johannes, Danzer Karin M, Synofzik Matthis, Brockmann Kathrin, Falkenburger Björn H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Seed amplification assays (SAA) detect alpha-synuclein (aSYN) pathology in patient biomatrices such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-potentially even before clinical manifestations. As CSF-based SAA are approaching broader use in clinical trials and research, ensuring that different laboratories obtain the same results becomes increasingly important.
METHODS: In this cross-laboratory, cross-aSYN-recombinant substrate and cross-protocol round-robin test, we compared SAA results from a common set of 38 CSF samples measured independently in four research laboratories of the German Center for Neurodegenerative diseases. Three laboratories (A-C) used an assay protocol adapted from Parchi's group at ISNB (Bologna, Italy); laboratory D used an assay protocol adapted from Amprion Inc. Two different manufacturers of aSYN protein were used as substrates for the SAA reaction.
RESULTS: Qualitative results were identical in at least three of the four laboratories for 37 out of 38 samples (20 positive, 17 negative). Fleiss Kappa for all four laboratories was 0.751 (z = 12, p < 0.001). For each laboratory, agreement with laboratory A was > 92%. For the number of positive replicates, Fleiss Kappa was 0.45 for a score of zero positive replicates and 0.42 for a score of four positive replicates.
CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative SAA results showed a high level of agreement across research laboratories, aSYN monomers, and assay protocols. Small differences between laboratories were systematic, consistent with the notion that SAA reports biologically relevant properties. These results also underline that round-robin tests can be helpful in assessing and ensuring SAA quality across laboratories.
METHODS: In this cross-laboratory, cross-aSYN-recombinant substrate and cross-protocol round-robin test, we compared SAA results from a common set of 38 CSF samples measured independently in four research laboratories of the German Center for Neurodegenerative diseases. Three laboratories (A-C) used an assay protocol adapted from Parchi's group at ISNB (Bologna, Italy); laboratory D used an assay protocol adapted from Amprion Inc. Two different manufacturers of aSYN protein were used as substrates for the SAA reaction.
RESULTS: Qualitative results were identical in at least three of the four laboratories for 37 out of 38 samples (20 positive, 17 negative). Fleiss Kappa for all four laboratories was 0.751 (z = 12, p < 0.001). For each laboratory, agreement with laboratory A was > 92%. For the number of positive replicates, Fleiss Kappa was 0.45 for a score of zero positive replicates and 0.42 for a score of four positive replicates.
CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative SAA results showed a high level of agreement across research laboratories, aSYN monomers, and assay protocols. Small differences between laboratories were systematic, consistent with the notion that SAA reports biologically relevant properties. These results also underline that round-robin tests can be helpful in assessing and ensuring SAA quality across laboratories.