International journal of cardiology · 2015
The mechanisms of spontaneous termination of reentrant supraventricular tachycardias.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chiale Pablo A, Baranchuk Adrián, González Mario D, Sánchez Rubén A, Garro Hugo A, Fernández Pablo A, Avalos Carlos Quiroga, Enriquez Andres, Elizari Marcelo V
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) often terminate spontaneously, presumably due to changes in the electrophysiological properties of the reentrant circuit. However, the mechanism of spontaneous termination of these arrhythmias is incompletely understood.
METHODS: We included 70 consecutive patients with reentrant supraventricular tachycardias (35 AVNRT, 35 AVRT) in whom the arrhythmia ended spontaneously during the electrophysiologic study. We determined in each patient the duration of the induced arrhythmia, site of block, beat-to-beat oscillations in tachycardia cycle-length (CL), A-H, H-V, H-A and V-A intervals.
RESULTS: In 21/34 (62%) patients with AVNRT and 19/30 (63%) with orthodromic AVRT, tachycardia termination was preceded by progressive increase in tachycardia CL due to prolongation of the A-H interval (Mobitz type-I pattern). In 13/34 patients with AVNRT (38%) and 11/30 with orthodromic AVRT (37%), termination occurred suddenly without a preceding change in CL, with block ensuing retrogradely either in the fast AV nodal pathway or the accessory pathway (Mobitz type-II pattern). In 4/5 patients with antidromic AVRT the tachycardia ended at the retrograde limb with previous prolongation of the VA interval.
CONCLUSION: Spontaneous termination of AVNRT and AVRT is a time-related phenomenon. Despite different pathways being involved in these two reentrant tachycardias, termination can follow antegrade or retrograde block in similar ratio (60% antegradely and 40% retrogradely). Antegrade block is preceded by prolongation of the AH interval (Mobitz type-I), whereas retrograde block occurs unexpectedly in the retrograde limb (Mobitz type-II). Fatigue of conduction appears to be involved in this phenomenon.
METHODS: We included 70 consecutive patients with reentrant supraventricular tachycardias (35 AVNRT, 35 AVRT) in whom the arrhythmia ended spontaneously during the electrophysiologic study. We determined in each patient the duration of the induced arrhythmia, site of block, beat-to-beat oscillations in tachycardia cycle-length (CL), A-H, H-V, H-A and V-A intervals.
RESULTS: In 21/34 (62%) patients with AVNRT and 19/30 (63%) with orthodromic AVRT, tachycardia termination was preceded by progressive increase in tachycardia CL due to prolongation of the A-H interval (Mobitz type-I pattern). In 13/34 patients with AVNRT (38%) and 11/30 with orthodromic AVRT (37%), termination occurred suddenly without a preceding change in CL, with block ensuing retrogradely either in the fast AV nodal pathway or the accessory pathway (Mobitz type-II pattern). In 4/5 patients with antidromic AVRT the tachycardia ended at the retrograde limb with previous prolongation of the VA interval.
CONCLUSION: Spontaneous termination of AVNRT and AVRT is a time-related phenomenon. Despite different pathways being involved in these two reentrant tachycardias, termination can follow antegrade or retrograde block in similar ratio (60% antegradely and 40% retrogradely). Antegrade block is preceded by prolongation of the AH interval (Mobitz type-I), whereas retrograde block occurs unexpectedly in the retrograde limb (Mobitz type-II). Fatigue of conduction appears to be involved in this phenomenon.