Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2014
Effect of pulmonary vein isolation on atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in patients with high dispersion of atrial refractoriness.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Zhen-xing, Zhong Jing-quan, Rong Bing, Yue Xin, Zheng Zhao-tong, Zhu Qing, Yi Shao-lei, Wang Jun-tao, Li Man, Zhang Yun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) efficacy on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and to determine a predictive dispersion of atrial refractoriness (dERP) value for performing PVI in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) patients.
METHODS: Of 67 PSVT patients with past AF episodes who underwent accessory pathway (AP) or slow pathway of atrioventricular node ablation, 63 (4 lost to follow-up or death) were assigned into two groups (A and B; 29 and 34 patients, respectively) based on whether they underwent or not subsequent PVI, and all were followed-up up to 3 years. Atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and dERP were measured during the ablation procedure.
RESULTS: In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, dERP = 74.5 ms effectively predicted AF recurrence in PSVT patients (p = 0.003). Difference in AF recurrence rate between groups did not reach statistical significance (17.2%, 5/29 vs. 29.4%, 10/34, p = 0.203). AF recurrence rate was lower in patients with dERP >74.5 ms who underwent AP or slow-pathway ablation with vs. without PVI (18.2%, 2/11 vs. 77.8%, 7/9, p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: PVI addition after successful AP or slow pathway of atrioventricular node ablation significantly reduced AF recurrence in PSVT patients with high atrial vulnerability (dERP >74.5 ms).
METHODS: Of 67 PSVT patients with past AF episodes who underwent accessory pathway (AP) or slow pathway of atrioventricular node ablation, 63 (4 lost to follow-up or death) were assigned into two groups (A and B; 29 and 34 patients, respectively) based on whether they underwent or not subsequent PVI, and all were followed-up up to 3 years. Atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and dERP were measured during the ablation procedure.
RESULTS: In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, dERP = 74.5 ms effectively predicted AF recurrence in PSVT patients (p = 0.003). Difference in AF recurrence rate between groups did not reach statistical significance (17.2%, 5/29 vs. 29.4%, 10/34, p = 0.203). AF recurrence rate was lower in patients with dERP >74.5 ms who underwent AP or slow-pathway ablation with vs. without PVI (18.2%, 2/11 vs. 77.8%, 7/9, p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: PVI addition after successful AP or slow pathway of atrioventricular node ablation significantly reduced AF recurrence in PSVT patients with high atrial vulnerability (dERP >74.5 ms).