Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2014
Comparison of regular atrial tachycardia incidence after circumferential radiofrequency versus cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in real-life practice.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Akerström Finn, Bastani Hamid, Insulander Per, Schwieler Jonas, Arias Miguel A, Jensen-Urstad Mats
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Postablation atrial tachycardia (AT) is a significant complication following radiofrequency (RF) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Cryoballoon (CB) ablation is an alternative technique for PVI that appears to have a low incidence of AT. No direct comparison between AT risk in RF and CB ablation has been made.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence and characteristics of ATs after PVI with RF and with CB ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS: All patients who underwent their first PVI between January 2006 and September 2012 using either RF or CB ablation were included. When a repeat ablation procedure for AT was performed, the arrhythmia was classified as typical cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) flutter or left atrial tachycardia (LA-AT) based on invasive mapping procedure findings and ECG P-wave morphology.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 415 and 215 consecutive patients in the RF and CB groups, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 38 ± 21 months, 52 (8.3%) patients presented ATs (9.4% and 6% in the RF and CB groups, respectively; P = 0.15). Of those, 26 (4.1%) were classified as LA-AT with 20 (4.8%) in the RF group and 6 (2.8%) in the CB group (P = 0.23). In patients without a history of typical CTI flutter or CTI line (n = 458), the incidence for this type of arrhythmia during follow-up was 3.5%.
CONCLUSION: In patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing either RF or CB PVI as the sole ablation strategy, the incidence of postprocedural AT was low and there was no significant difference between the 2 techniques.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence and characteristics of ATs after PVI with RF and with CB ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS: All patients who underwent their first PVI between January 2006 and September 2012 using either RF or CB ablation were included. When a repeat ablation procedure for AT was performed, the arrhythmia was classified as typical cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) flutter or left atrial tachycardia (LA-AT) based on invasive mapping procedure findings and ECG P-wave morphology.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 415 and 215 consecutive patients in the RF and CB groups, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 38 ± 21 months, 52 (8.3%) patients presented ATs (9.4% and 6% in the RF and CB groups, respectively; P = 0.15). Of those, 26 (4.1%) were classified as LA-AT with 20 (4.8%) in the RF group and 6 (2.8%) in the CB group (P = 0.23). In patients without a history of typical CTI flutter or CTI line (n = 458), the incidence for this type of arrhythmia during follow-up was 3.5%.
CONCLUSION: In patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing either RF or CB PVI as the sole ablation strategy, the incidence of postprocedural AT was low and there was no significant difference between the 2 techniques.