Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021
The diagnostic value of the combination of hemoglobin, CA199, CA125, and HE4 in endometriosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Ting, Wei Jia-Ling, Leng Ting, Gao Fei, Hou Shun-Yu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the differences in the peripheral blood cells and tumor biomarkers between the patients with endometriosis and healthy people, and establish a more efficient combined diagnostic model.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the differences in the peripheral blood cells and tumor biomarkers between the patients with endometriosis and healthy people. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to establish a combined diagnostic model. We plotted the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to analyze the diagnostic efficiency of different diagnostic indexes.
RESULTS: Compared with patients in the control group, patients in the endometriosis group had significantly lower eosinophil% (p = 0.045), neutrophil (p = 0.001), lymphocyte (p < 0.001), red blood cells (RBCs) (p < 0.001), and hemoglobin (HGB) (p < 0.001), and had significantly higher monocyte% (p = 0.008), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) (p = 0.001), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (p < 0.001), carbohydrate antigen (CA)-199 (p < 0.001), CA125 (p < 0.001), human epididymis protein (HE)-4 (p < 0.001), and the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) (p < 0.001). The combined diagnostic model of HGB, CA199, CA125, and HE4 was established by binary logistic regression analysis. The ROC curve showed that the combined diagnostic model reached a sensitivity of 85.4%, a specificity of 78.83%, and an area under the curve of 0.900, which was significantly higher than that of the individual index in endometriosis diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: The combined diagnostic model of HGB, CA199, CA125, and HE4 may provide a new approach for the early non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the differences in the peripheral blood cells and tumor biomarkers between the patients with endometriosis and healthy people. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to establish a combined diagnostic model. We plotted the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to analyze the diagnostic efficiency of different diagnostic indexes.
RESULTS: Compared with patients in the control group, patients in the endometriosis group had significantly lower eosinophil% (p = 0.045), neutrophil (p = 0.001), lymphocyte (p < 0.001), red blood cells (RBCs) (p < 0.001), and hemoglobin (HGB) (p < 0.001), and had significantly higher monocyte% (p = 0.008), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) (p = 0.001), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (p < 0.001), carbohydrate antigen (CA)-199 (p < 0.001), CA125 (p < 0.001), human epididymis protein (HE)-4 (p < 0.001), and the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) (p < 0.001). The combined diagnostic model of HGB, CA199, CA125, and HE4 was established by binary logistic regression analysis. The ROC curve showed that the combined diagnostic model reached a sensitivity of 85.4%, a specificity of 78.83%, and an area under the curve of 0.900, which was significantly higher than that of the individual index in endometriosis diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: The combined diagnostic model of HGB, CA199, CA125, and HE4 may provide a new approach for the early non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.