Respiratory medicine · 2019
Performance of the COPD Assessment Test in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suzuki Atsushi, Kondoh Yasuhiro, Swigris Jeffrey James, Matsuda Toshiaki, Kimura Tomoki, Kataoka Kensuke, Ando Masahiko, Hashimoto Naozumi, Sakamoto Koji, Hasegawa Yoshinori
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) often experience impaired health status. In daily clinical practice, a short and easy instrument for assessing health status would be useful to help better understand the patient's condition. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a simple questionnaire about respiratory symptoms and their impact. We aimed to examine the CAT's performance characteristics and to generate data to support its reliability and validity in patients with CTD-ILD.
METHODS: We used data from 132 CTD-ILD patients evaluated at Tosei General Hospital from July 2011 to July 2016 to assess the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of the CAT.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 64.5 years and 87 (66%) were women. There were no significant differences in CAT score between any of the CTD subgroups. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.881) and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.803) for the CAT score were acceptable. At baseline, CAT score was significantly associated with clinically meaningful measures of physiologic function, exercise capacity, and dyspnea. Change in CAT score over 6-12 months was also associated with change in other measures. In the distribution- and anchor-based analyses, the estimated minimal clinically important difference of CAT score was 1-4 points.
CONCLUSION: These data support the validity and reliability of CAT as a sensitive measure for assessing health status in patients with CTD-ILD.
METHODS: We used data from 132 CTD-ILD patients evaluated at Tosei General Hospital from July 2011 to July 2016 to assess the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of the CAT.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 64.5 years and 87 (66%) were women. There were no significant differences in CAT score between any of the CTD subgroups. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.881) and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.803) for the CAT score were acceptable. At baseline, CAT score was significantly associated with clinically meaningful measures of physiologic function, exercise capacity, and dyspnea. Change in CAT score over 6-12 months was also associated with change in other measures. In the distribution- and anchor-based analyses, the estimated minimal clinically important difference of CAT score was 1-4 points.
CONCLUSION: These data support the validity and reliability of CAT as a sensitive measure for assessing health status in patients with CTD-ILD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedBlood Gas AnalysisConnective Tissue DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDyspneaExerciseFemaleHealth StatusHumansLung Diseases, InterstitialMaleMiddle AgedPhysical EndurancePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory Function TestsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires