The British journal of dermatology · 2016
Summary of results of serological tests and diagnoses for 4774 cases of various autoimmune bullous diseases consulted to Kurume University.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hashimoto T, Tsuruta D, Koga H, Fukuda S, Ohyama B, Komai A, Karashima T, Ohata C, Teye K, Ishii N
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although many new disease entities of autoimmune bullous disease (AIBD) have recently been recognized, satisfactory immunological diagnostic methods and comprehensive classifications for various AIBDs have not been established.
OBJECTIVES: To identify immunological diagnostics and comprehensive classifications for AIBDs.
METHODS: We selected and examined 4774 patients with various AIBDs from our cohort of 5063 patients with difficult AIBDs, whose sera and information were sent for our diagnostic method from other institutes in either Japan or other countries over the last 19 years. We examined the sera by our immunological diagnostic methods including various immunofluorescence, immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests to make final diagnoses.
RESULTS: By our immunological diagnostic methods, we successfully made final diagnoses for approximately three-quarters of the difficult cases of AIBD, although the remaining cases could not be diagnosed. Using the results, we suggest the most extensive and newest classification of AIBDs, and also propose the most efficient algorithm of immunological tests for the diagnosis of various AIBDs.
CONCLUSIONS: The results in this study of 4774 patients with various AIBDs indicate that our immunological diagnostic method is useful for making diagnoses for most patients with AIBD. However, we need further improvements including new immunological techniques to establish more satisfactory methods.
OBJECTIVES: To identify immunological diagnostics and comprehensive classifications for AIBDs.
METHODS: We selected and examined 4774 patients with various AIBDs from our cohort of 5063 patients with difficult AIBDs, whose sera and information were sent for our diagnostic method from other institutes in either Japan or other countries over the last 19 years. We examined the sera by our immunological diagnostic methods including various immunofluorescence, immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests to make final diagnoses.
RESULTS: By our immunological diagnostic methods, we successfully made final diagnoses for approximately three-quarters of the difficult cases of AIBD, although the remaining cases could not be diagnosed. Using the results, we suggest the most extensive and newest classification of AIBDs, and also propose the most efficient algorithm of immunological tests for the diagnosis of various AIBDs.
CONCLUSIONS: The results in this study of 4774 patients with various AIBDs indicate that our immunological diagnostic method is useful for making diagnoses for most patients with AIBD. However, we need further improvements including new immunological techniques to establish more satisfactory methods.