Tailored ablation index for pulmonary vein isolation according to wall thickness within the ablation circle.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Ablation index (AI), a novel lesion quality marker, includes contact force, time, and power of radiofrequency (RF) application, but not regional variation in wall thickness within the wide antral catheter ablation (WACA) circle. This study explored the relationships among AI target value, atrial wall thickness, and gap formation within the WACA circle in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).
METHODS
We evaluated 102 consecutive patients (mean age, 65 ± 9 years) with PAF who underwent AI-guided WACA for ipsilateral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Each WACA circle was subdivided into eight segments, and overall 7143 RF applications were delivered, including 125 gaps in PVI ablation lines. For each RF tag within the ablation circle, we collected data on ablation lesion depth surrogates (time of application, delivery power, impedance drop, average contact force, force-time integral [FTI], and AI) and left atrial wall thickness measured by multidetector computer tomography scanning.
RESULTS
The anterior and roof walls were the thickest segments of the ablation circle, in which 85.8% of gaps concentrated, while the posterior and inferior walls were the thinnest. Gap formation was significantly associated with FTI, AI, wall thickness, FTI/wall thickness, and AI/wall thickness. AI/wall thickness had the highest predictive value for gap formation, with a cutoff of 195.6 au/mm for effective ablation.
CONCLUSIONS
In AI-guided PVI of PAF, AI/wall thickness by normalizing myocardial thickness variation along the WACA circle was a strong predictor of gap formation, with a target of 195.6 au/mm appearing suitable for effective ablation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.