The clinical respiratory journal · 2023
Clinical significance of para-carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: The relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamakawa Hideaki, Sato Shintaro, Ohta Hiroki, Takatsuka Makiko, Kusano Kenji, Kawabe Rie, Oba Tomohiro, Akasaka Keiichi, Amano Masako, Araya Jun, Sasaki Hiroki, Matsushima Hidekazu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Para-tracheal or para-carinal air cysts (PACs) are often asymptomatic and usually detected incidentally by methods such as computed tomography. Their clinical significance is unclear in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE).
METHODS: We evaluated the clinical significance of PACs in PPFE and their relationship with pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax.
RESULTS: In total, 50 patients had PPFE and 34 (68%) had PACs. Most PACs were para-carinal (n = 30). A para-tracheal air cyst was detected in only nine patients, which included five patients having both para-carinal and para-tracheal air cysts. Overall median survival was 24.7 months. Survival was not significantly different between the patients with [PACs(+)] and without PACs (P = 0.268). A high frequency (64%) of the complication of pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax occurred in the overall population during follow-up. Pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax occurred significantly more frequently in patients with PACs(+) than in those without (76.5% vs. 37.5%; P = 0.012). PACs(+) was the only significant risk factor for pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that PACs commonly occur in patients with PPFE, and most PACs were para-carinal air cysts. Additionally, PACs(+) was a significant risk factor for pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax; therefore, clinicians should be more aware of these complications during follow-up examination, particular in PACs(+) patients with PPFE.
METHODS: We evaluated the clinical significance of PACs in PPFE and their relationship with pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax.
RESULTS: In total, 50 patients had PPFE and 34 (68%) had PACs. Most PACs were para-carinal (n = 30). A para-tracheal air cyst was detected in only nine patients, which included five patients having both para-carinal and para-tracheal air cysts. Overall median survival was 24.7 months. Survival was not significantly different between the patients with [PACs(+)] and without PACs (P = 0.268). A high frequency (64%) of the complication of pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax occurred in the overall population during follow-up. Pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax occurred significantly more frequently in patients with PACs(+) than in those without (76.5% vs. 37.5%; P = 0.012). PACs(+) was the only significant risk factor for pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that PACs commonly occur in patients with PPFE, and most PACs were para-carinal air cysts. Additionally, PACs(+) was a significant risk factor for pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax; therefore, clinicians should be more aware of these complications during follow-up examination, particular in PACs(+) patients with PPFE.