Journal of affective disorders · 2025
Latent profile analysis of adolescent antisocial behavior: The role of situational factors with physical activity as a moderator.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Xinmeng, Yi Xiangren, Dong Xiaosheng
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study used Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to identify distinct antisocial behavior (ASB) profiles among Chinese adolescents and examined the influence of family characteristics, health risk behaviors (HRBs), quality of life (QoL), and physical activity (PA) levels on these profiles.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 18,397 adolescents was conducted using self-reported measures of ASB, family characteristics, HRBs, QoL, and PA levels. LPA was used to classify adolescents into ASB categories. Multivariate logistic regression and subgroup analyses compared differences across profiles.
RESULTS: Profiles were differentiated by the severity of ASB rather than specific types of problematic behaviors. Factors such as non-only child status, parental conflict, sedentary behavior, and alcohol consumption were significantly associated with higher ASB levels. Physical activity subgroups displayed distinct patterns, with males in high-PA subgroups and females in low-PA subgroups showing differing ASB profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Targeted interventions should address specific ASB types within defined populations. Group-based physical activities fostering peer communication are recommended to mitigate ASB risks, especially among adolescents with lower PA levels. Future research should explore causal mechanisms to refine public health strategies.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 18,397 adolescents was conducted using self-reported measures of ASB, family characteristics, HRBs, QoL, and PA levels. LPA was used to classify adolescents into ASB categories. Multivariate logistic regression and subgroup analyses compared differences across profiles.
RESULTS: Profiles were differentiated by the severity of ASB rather than specific types of problematic behaviors. Factors such as non-only child status, parental conflict, sedentary behavior, and alcohol consumption were significantly associated with higher ASB levels. Physical activity subgroups displayed distinct patterns, with males in high-PA subgroups and females in low-PA subgroups showing differing ASB profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Targeted interventions should address specific ASB types within defined populations. Group-based physical activities fostering peer communication are recommended to mitigate ASB risks, especially among adolescents with lower PA levels. Future research should explore causal mechanisms to refine public health strategies.