MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.004

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of ophthalmology · 2005

Pterygium, pinguecula, and 5-year incidence of cataract.

Pham Thuan Quoc, Wang Jie Jin, Rochtchina Elena, Mitchell Paul

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To assess longitudinal associations between pterygium, pinguecula, and 5-year incident cataract.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

METHODS

The Blue Mountains Eye Study examined 3,654 residents aged > or =49 years during 1992 to 1994 and reexamined 2,335 (75.1% of survivors) 5 years later. Slit-lamp examination recorded pterygium and pinguecula. Cataract was assessed using masked grading of lens photographs. Incidence was assessed in participants without cataract at baseline. Eye-specific data were analyzed using generalized estimating equation models, adjusting for age, sex, smoking, diabetes, and corticosteroid use.

RESULTS

Pinguecula was associated with a borderline-significant, increased risk of developing cortical cataract (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.7). We found no significant association between baseline pterygium and the incidence of cortical, nuclear, or posterior subcapsular cataract.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal data from the same study population provide weak support for cross-sectional associations between pinguecula and cortical cataract previously reported from our study.

Для цитирования: Pham Thuan Quoc, Wang Jie Jin, Rochtchina Elena, Mitchell Paul. Pterygium, pinguecula, and 5-year incidence of cataract.. American journal of ophthalmology. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.