MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00465.x

Медицинская библиотека · Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica · 2005

The cut-and-paste method for primary pterygium surgery: long-term follow-up.

Koranyi Gabor, Seregard Stefan, Kopp Eva Dafgård

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the recurrence rate, reoperation rate and side-effects of a novel technique for pterygium surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 461 eyes of 381 patients operated for primary nasal pterygium by the same surgeon between 1994 and 2003 and followed for 23 +/- 20 months (range 6-112 months).

METHODS

Autologous conjunctival grafts harvested at the superotemporal limbus were used to cover the sclera after pterygium excision. Using a retrospective chart review, the outcome after attaching the transplant to the sclera with a fibrin tissue adhesive (n = 325) was compared to the outcome after graft attachment using absorbable sutures (n = 136).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence rate, reoperation rate and complications.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate was 5.3% in the glue group and 13.5% in the suture group (p = 0.01). The reoperation rates were 1.2% and 3.3%, respectively (p = 0.31). Complications, such as transient transplant oedema and persistent corneal epithelial defects, occurred equally in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Using a fibrin tissue adhesive instead of sutures when attaching the conjunctival transplant in primary pterygium surgery results in a significantly lower recurrence rate.

Для цитирования: Koranyi Gabor, Seregard Stefan, Kopp Eva Dafgård. The cut-and-paste method for primary pterygium surgery: long-term follow-up.. Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00465.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.