MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.26650/eor.2018.543

Медицинская библиотека · European oral research · 2018

Evaluation of salivary tumour necrosis factor-alpha in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis.

Hegde Shruthi, Ajila Vidya, Babu Subhas, Kumari Suchetha, Ullal Harshini, Madiyal Ananya

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Present study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the salivary levels of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in subjects with RAS, traumatic ulcers (TUs) in the oral mucosa and in healthy controls.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Present study involved 90 participants of which 30 subjects were diagnosed with RAS, 30 subjects with TUs and 30 healthy controls grouped as group 1, group 2 and group 3 respectively. Unstimulated saliva was collected from the subjects through 'Spit Technique' and the estimation of TNF-α was done by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The data collected was statistically analysed.

RESULTS

Salivary level of TNF-α was significantly higher in RAS patients than in patients with TUs and healthy controls. Difference between the Salivary TNF-α level in our study groups were statistically significant (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Present study suggests that saliva is a convenient and ideal medium for the detection of TNF-α. Statistically significant difference in the level of salivary TNF-α between the RAS and TUs subjects as well as controls suggests the significant contribution of TNF-α in pathogenesis of RAS.

Для цитирования: Hegde Shruthi, Ajila Vidya, Babu Subhas, Kumari Suchetha, Ullal Harshini, Madiyal Ananya. Evaluation of salivary tumour necrosis factor-alpha in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis.. European oral research. 2018. DOI: 10.26650/eor.2018.543.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.