Journal of global antimicrobial resistance · 2023
No transmitted drug resistance to HIV integrase strand-transfer inhibitors after their scale-up in Estonia in 2017.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Šablinskaja Arina, Pauskar Merit, Jõgeda Ene-Ly, Rajasaar Heli, Soodla Pilleriin, Kallas Eveli, Velts-Lindh Anna, Küüsmaa Ruth, Zilmer Kai, Rüütel Kristi, Päll Taavi, Lutsar Irja, Huik Kristi, Avi Radko
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: In Eastern Europe, HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance (TDR) data, especially in the integrase (IN) region, are limited. In Estonia, INSTI (integrase strand transfer inhibitors) TDR has been studied only prior to the INSTI scale-up in late 2010s. The current study aimed to determine the levels of protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT) and IN surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) among newly diagnosed patients in Estonia in 2017.
METHODS: The study included 216 newly diagnosed HIV-1 individuals from 1 January until 31 December 2017 in Estonia. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the Estonian Health Board, the Estonian HIV Cohort Study (E-HIV) and clinical laboratories' databases. The PR-RT and IN regions were sequenced and analysed for SDRMs and subtype determination.
RESULTS: Seventy-one percent (151/213) of available HIV-positive samples were successfully sequenced. The overall level of TDR was 7.9% (12/151; 95% CI 4.4%-13.8%); no dual or triple class resistance was detected. No major INSTI mutations were found. The distribution of SDRMs for NNRTI, NRTI and PI was 5.9% (9/151), 1.3% (2/151) and 0.7% (1/151), respectively. The predominant NNRTI mutation was K103N. CRF06_cpx was the predominant variant (59%) in the Estonian HIV-1 population, followed by subtype A (9%) and subtype B (8%).
CONCLUSION: Although no major INSTI mutations were found, close monitoring of INSTI SDRMs is needed considering the extensive use of the first- and second-generation INSTIs. PR-RT TDR is slowly rising in Estonia, indicating the need for continuous surveillance in the future. Low genetic barrier NNRTIs should be avoided in the treatment regimens.
METHODS: The study included 216 newly diagnosed HIV-1 individuals from 1 January until 31 December 2017 in Estonia. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the Estonian Health Board, the Estonian HIV Cohort Study (E-HIV) and clinical laboratories' databases. The PR-RT and IN regions were sequenced and analysed for SDRMs and subtype determination.
RESULTS: Seventy-one percent (151/213) of available HIV-positive samples were successfully sequenced. The overall level of TDR was 7.9% (12/151; 95% CI 4.4%-13.8%); no dual or triple class resistance was detected. No major INSTI mutations were found. The distribution of SDRMs for NNRTI, NRTI and PI was 5.9% (9/151), 1.3% (2/151) and 0.7% (1/151), respectively. The predominant NNRTI mutation was K103N. CRF06_cpx was the predominant variant (59%) in the Estonian HIV-1 population, followed by subtype A (9%) and subtype B (8%).
CONCLUSION: Although no major INSTI mutations were found, close monitoring of INSTI SDRMs is needed considering the extensive use of the first- and second-generation INSTIs. PR-RT TDR is slowly rising in Estonia, indicating the need for continuous surveillance in the future. Low genetic barrier NNRTIs should be avoided in the treatment regimens.