The Impact of Epithelial Remodeling on Surgical Techniques Used in Topography-guided Surface Ablation in Irregular Corneas.

PURPOSE: To analyze the optical consequences of epithelial remodeling in irregular corneas and their impact on the choice of different surface ablation techniques.

METHODS

Anterior corneal and stromal surface topographies and epithelial thickness maps were analyzed in 24 eyes with irregular corneal optics. On two of the eyes, four different surface ablation techniques were simulated: (1) conventional anterior topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), (2) transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK), (3) transepithelial anterior topography-guided PRK, and (4) stromal topography-guided PRK.

RESULTS

Stromal surface topographies showed higher keratometric values, astigmatism, asphericity, and corneal higher order aberrations compared to topographies of anterior corneas covered by epithelium. Transepithelial anterior topography-guided PRK and stromal topography-guided PRK both resulted in regularized stromal surface, transepithelial PTK achieved partial regularization corresponding to the smoothing effect of the epithelial remodeling, and conventional anterior topography-guided PRK delivered after epithelial removal resulted in residual stromal surface irregularities.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in optical landscapes between the stromal and anterior surfaces in irregular corneas will represent a source of error when anterior topography-guided treatments are delivered on the deepithelialized stroma, as in conventional PRK. In contrast, anterior topography-guided ablations performed as transepithelial PRK and stromal topography-guided PRK delivered after epithelial removal address the full stromal irregularity, whereas transepithelial PTK alone may be used when topography-guided treatments are not possible. The authors conclude topography-guided PRK of irregular corneas should lead to significantly improved regularization only if it includes the effect of epithelial remodeling. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(8):529-537.].