A Critical Analysis of the Utility of Intraoperative Angiography.

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative digital subtraction angiography (ioDSA) is touted as the gold standard imaging evaluation for aneurysm clip constructs. Candid evaluations of its limitations are sparse.

METHODS

A prospectively collected hospital billing database was queried to identify craniotomies for aneurysm clipping from January 2010 to December 2013. We evaluated the rate of occult residual and parent vessel stenosis determined on follow-up angiography for patients undergoing ioDSA and those not undergoing ioDSA. Comparisons were performed via Fisher exact test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

From our database search, we found 187 patients who underwent ioDSA after aneurysm clipping and an additional 91 patients who did not. Results from ioDSA influenced operative management in 17% of cases. Sixty-four patients with 70 treated aneurysms undergoing ioDSA had postoperative angiography; 7 occult residuals were discovered, yielding a 10% false-negative rate, with 10% of aneurysms showing residual. Occult residuals at the middle cerebral artery bifurcation represented most discovered residuals (6/7). Thirty-two patients with 37 treated aneurysms did not undergo ioDSA and had angiographic follow-up; 24% of patients were found to have residual aneurysms (P = 0.08 compared with patients undergoing ioDSA). Residuals at the anterior communicating artery (ACoA) represented 56% of all residuals, whereas the ACoA represented only 18% of aneurysms clipped. The rate of residuals was significantly higher than that for patients with clipped ACoA aneurysms undergoing ioDSA (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

ioDSA influenced management in nearly one fifth of cases. It can be particularly beneficial in detecting residuals for ACoA aneurysms; its benefit was less apparent for middle cerebral artery aneurysms.