Scale of differentiated service delivery implementation in HIV care facilities in low- and middle-income countries: a global facility survey.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fernández Villalobos Nathalie Verónica, Helfenstein Fabrice, Khol Vohith, Twizere Christella, Secco Mayara, Castelnuovo Barbara, Huwa Jacqueline, Tiendredbeogo Thierry, Wester C William, Fong Siew Moy, Murenzi Gad, Caro-Vega Yanink, Lyamuya Rita Elias, Rafael Idiovinio, Zannou Djimon Marcel, Petoumenos Kathy, Nsonde Dominique Mahambou, Pinto Jorge, Wools-Kaloustian Kara, Moore Carolyn Bolton, Takassi Ounoo Elom, Kiertiburanakul Sasisopin, Awoh Rogers Ajeh, Ali Shamim M, Fatti Geoffrey, Malateste Karen, Zaniewski Elizabeth, Ballif Marie, International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS
Аннотация
METHODS: We analysed facility-level survey data from HIV care facilities participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS consortium in 2019. We used descriptive statistics to summarise the availability of DSD, multi-month dispensing (MMD) and DSD for HIV treatment models. We explored factors associated with DSD implementation using multivariable models.
RESULTS: We included 175 facilities in the Asia-Pacific (n = 30), Latin America (n = 8), Central Africa (n = 21), East Africa (n = 74), Southern Africa (n = 28) and West Africa (n = 14). Overall, 133 facilities (76%) reported implementing DSD. Of these, 91% offered DSD for HIV treatment, 61% for HIV testing and 59% for antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. The most common duration of ART refills for clinically stable clients was 3MMD, (70%), followed by monthly (14%) and 6MMD (10%). Facility-based individual models were the most frequently available DSD for the HIV treatment model (82%), followed by client-managed group models (60%). Out-of-facility individual models were available at 48% of facilities. Facility-based individual models were particularly common among facilities in East (92%) and Southern Africa (96%). Facilities in medium and high HIV prevalence countries, and those with 3MMD, were more likely to implement DSD.
CONCLUSIONS: In 2019, DSD was available in most HIV care facilities globally but was not evenly implemented across regions and HIV services. Most offered facility-based DSD for HIV treatment models and 3MMD for clinically stable clients. Efforts to expand DSD for HIV testing and ART initiation and to offer longer MMD can improve long-term retention in care of people living with HIV in LMICs, while further alleviating the operational burden on healthcare services. These findings from the pre-COVID-19 era underline the need for strengthening DSD in HIV care, which remains at the centre of current efforts towards client-centred care.