MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11882-018-0800-z

Медицинская библиотека · Current allergy and asthma reports · 2018

Endotypes of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Across Ancestry and Geographic Regions.

Chitsuthipakorn Wirach, Seresirikachorn Kachorn, Sommer Doron D, McHugh Tobial, Snidvongs Kornkiat

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Preliminary studies have suggested differences in endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) across ancestry/ethnic groups. Eosinophilic CRS (ECRS) is the predominant subtype for Western/European ancestry CRS patients and non-eosinophilic CRS (nECRS) for Asian patients. This review aims to re-analyze CRS endotypes across ancestry populations using one consistent criteria to existing data.

RECENT FINDINGS: Although tissue eosinophilia is the most commonly used criterion for ECRS, various cut-off points are suggested. Surrogate markers have been extensively studied. Sixty-six cohorts with study criteria were included with a total of 8557 patients. Raw data from 11 studies 544 patients were re-analyzed using number of tissue eosinophils. At lower cut-off values of ≥ 5 and ≥ 10 cells/HPF, most patients of Asian and Western/European ancestry were classified as ECRS without difference. In contrast, at cut-off points of ≥ 70 and ≥ 120 cells/HPF, the majority of both groups became reclassified as nECRS. After applying one consistent criteria to existing data, differences across ancestry and geographic populations in endotypes of CRS were no longer evident.

Для цитирования: Chitsuthipakorn Wirach, Seresirikachorn Kachorn, Sommer Doron D, McHugh Tobial, Snidvongs Kornkiat. Endotypes of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Across Ancestry and Geographic Regions.. Current allergy and asthma reports. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11882-018-0800-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.