MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4097/kja.d.17.00078

Медицинская библиотека · Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2018

Anesthetic considerations during surgical intervention in Woake's syndrome -a case report.

Choi So Ron, Kim Jeong Ho, Chae Kyoung Lin, Lee Seung Cheol, Park Sang Yoong

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Woake's syndrome (WS) is a recurrent nasal polyposis, accompanied by broadening of the nose, frontal sinus aplasia, dyscrinia, and bronchiectasis. There has been no previous report on anesthetic management in patients with WS.

CASE: We describe a case involving a 13-year-old male patient with WS who was scheduled for septorhinoplasty for necrotic ethmoiditis. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol and remifentanil using a target-controlled infusion device. The anesthetic considerations of this rare syndrome and the advantages of an intravenous infusion method over local and volatile anesthesia for these patients are discussed. We report on caveats, such as pulmonary dysfunction during the anesthetic management, and nasal structural problems encountered in WS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that conventional inhaled anesthesia reduces ciliary movement and that local anesthesia with sedative has several disadvantages, perioperative control and precautions against respiratory infections by using antibiotics, and preventing cilio-depressant actions, are important for anesthetic management.

Для цитирования: Choi So Ron, Kim Jeong Ho, Chae Kyoung Lin, Lee Seung Cheol, Park Sang Yoong. Anesthetic considerations during surgical intervention in Woake's syndrome -a case report.. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2018. DOI: 10.4097/kja.d.17.00078.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.