Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
A Type-Entry-Malperfusion-Based Propensity Score Matched Analysis Depending on Surgical Expertise in Patients Without Malperfusion Undergoing Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pitts Leonard, Hülsenberg Lina, Montagner Matteo, Kofler Markus, Nersesian Gaik, Kaemmel Julius, Heck Roland, Buz Semih, Falk Volkmar, Unbehaun Axel, Kempfert Jörg
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study investigates differences in short- and mid-term outcomes in patients without malperfusion undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between specialized aortic surgeons and non-aortic surgeons.
METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between 2013 and 2023 defined as M0 (no malperfusion) according to the type-entry-malperfusion classification were included and divided into 2 groups according to the surgeon's expertise: aortic surgeon vs non-aortic surgeon group, whereas an aortic surgeon was defined by expertise in extensive aortic arch surgery including frozen elephant trunk implantation on a regular basis (average ≥5/year). After propensity score matching, the groups were compared in terms of intraoperative variables and outcomes including a primary combined end-point consisting of 30-day mortality and/or CT-confirmed stroke.
RESULTS: The matched cohort comprised 2 balanced groups with 234 patients (117 in each group). Cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamp and distal arrest times did not differ significantly between the groups. However, more extensive aortic surgery was performed by aortic surgeons: aortic root replacement (Bentall) (P = .007; odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [CI, 1.05-1.32]), valve-sparing root replacement (David) (P = .013; OR 1.05 [CI, 1.01-1.10]), and frozen elephant trunk implantation (P < .001; OR 1.18 (CI, 1.09-1.27]). The combined end-point of 30-day mortality and/or CT-confirmed stroke was 26% in the non-aortic surgeon vs 23% in the aortic surgeon group (P = .54; OR 0.97 [CI, 0.86-1.08]). Further clinical outcomes, including 5-year survival, did not differ significantly (P = .170).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients without preoperative malperfusion undergoing surgery for ATAAD show no differences in terms of short- and mid-term outcomes between specialized aortic and non-aortic surgeons. However, more extensive aortic repair may be performed safely by specialized aortic surgeons. These results support the definition of an aortic surgeon based on experience with the frozen elephant trunk technique and may advocate for call coverage by an aortic surgeon for type A repair at high-volume centres.
METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between 2013 and 2023 defined as M0 (no malperfusion) according to the type-entry-malperfusion classification were included and divided into 2 groups according to the surgeon's expertise: aortic surgeon vs non-aortic surgeon group, whereas an aortic surgeon was defined by expertise in extensive aortic arch surgery including frozen elephant trunk implantation on a regular basis (average ≥5/year). After propensity score matching, the groups were compared in terms of intraoperative variables and outcomes including a primary combined end-point consisting of 30-day mortality and/or CT-confirmed stroke.
RESULTS: The matched cohort comprised 2 balanced groups with 234 patients (117 in each group). Cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamp and distal arrest times did not differ significantly between the groups. However, more extensive aortic surgery was performed by aortic surgeons: aortic root replacement (Bentall) (P = .007; odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [CI, 1.05-1.32]), valve-sparing root replacement (David) (P = .013; OR 1.05 [CI, 1.01-1.10]), and frozen elephant trunk implantation (P < .001; OR 1.18 (CI, 1.09-1.27]). The combined end-point of 30-day mortality and/or CT-confirmed stroke was 26% in the non-aortic surgeon vs 23% in the aortic surgeon group (P = .54; OR 0.97 [CI, 0.86-1.08]). Further clinical outcomes, including 5-year survival, did not differ significantly (P = .170).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients without preoperative malperfusion undergoing surgery for ATAAD show no differences in terms of short- and mid-term outcomes between specialized aortic and non-aortic surgeons. However, more extensive aortic repair may be performed safely by specialized aortic surgeons. These results support the definition of an aortic surgeon based on experience with the frozen elephant trunk technique and may advocate for call coverage by an aortic surgeon for type A repair at high-volume centres.