MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/icvts/ivag020

Медицинская библиотека · Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026

A Type-Entry-Malperfusion-Based Propensity Score Matched Analysis Depending on Surgical Expertise in Patients Without Malperfusion Undergoing Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Pitts Leonard, Hülsenberg Lina, Montagner Matteo, Kofler Markus, Nersesian Gaik, Kaemmel Julius, Heck Roland, Buz Semih, Falk Volkmar, Unbehaun Axel, Kempfert Jörg

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates differences in short- and mid-term outcomes in patients without malperfusion undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between specialized aortic surgeons and non-aortic surgeons.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between 2013 and 2023 defined as M0 (no malperfusion) according to the type-entry-malperfusion classification were included and divided into 2 groups according to the surgeon's expertise: aortic surgeon vs non-aortic surgeon group, whereas an aortic surgeon was defined by expertise in extensive aortic arch surgery including frozen elephant trunk implantation on a regular basis (average ≥5/year). After propensity score matching, the groups were compared in terms of intraoperative variables and outcomes including a primary combined end-point consisting of 30-day mortality and/or CT-confirmed stroke.

RESULTS

The matched cohort comprised 2 balanced groups with 234 patients (117 in each group). Cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamp and distal arrest times did not differ significantly between the groups. However, more extensive aortic surgery was performed by aortic surgeons: aortic root replacement (Bentall) (P = .007; odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [CI, 1.05-1.32]), valve-sparing root replacement (David) (P = .013; OR 1.05 [CI, 1.01-1.10]), and frozen elephant trunk implantation (P < .001; OR 1.18 (CI, 1.09-1.27]). The combined end-point of 30-day mortality and/or CT-confirmed stroke was 26% in the non-aortic surgeon vs 23% in the aortic surgeon group (P = .54; OR 0.97 [CI, 0.86-1.08]). Further clinical outcomes, including 5-year survival, did not differ significantly (P = .170).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients without preoperative malperfusion undergoing surgery for ATAAD show no differences in terms of short- and mid-term outcomes between specialized aortic and non-aortic surgeons. However, more extensive aortic repair may be performed safely by specialized aortic surgeons. These results support the definition of an aortic surgeon based on experience with the frozen elephant trunk technique and may advocate for call coverage by an aortic surgeon for type A repair at high-volume centres.

Для цитирования: Pitts Leonard, Hülsenberg Lina, Montagner Matteo, Kofler Markus, Nersesian Gaik, Kaemmel Julius, Heck Roland, Buz Semih, Falk Volkmar, Unbehaun Axel, Kempfert Jörg. A Type-Entry-Malperfusion-Based Propensity Score Matched Analysis Depending on Surgical Expertise in Patients Without Malperfusion Undergoing Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.. Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivag020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.