Acta ophthalmologica · 2013
Outsourced cataract surgery and postoperative endophthalmitis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Solborg Bjerrum Søren, Kiilgaard Jens F, Mikkelsen Kim L, la Cour Morten
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the risk of postoperative endophthalmitis (PE) after cataract surgery at eye departments in public hospitals and private hospitals/eye clinics and to evaluate if the Danish National Patient Registry (NPR) is a reliable database to monitor the PE risk.
METHODS: Postoperative endophthalmitis cases were retrospectively identified via the NPR and chart review in order to confirm PE cases that had cataract surgery in the calendar period 2002-2010.
RESULTS: We identified 39 cases of PE after 107 701 registered public cataract operations; PE risk = 0.36 [corrected] per 1000 operations and 27 cases of PE after 36 760 registered private operations; PE risk = 0.73 [corrected] per 1000 operations. There was homogeneity in the PE risk among the eye departments in public hospitals (p = 0.6), but heterogeneity in the PE risk among the private hospitals/eye clinics (p = 0.0001). Six private hospitals/eye clinics had a statistically significantly higher PE risk compared with the eye departments in public hospitals. In all, 98% of public cataract surgery was registered in the NPR compared with 38% of private cataract surgery. The private hospitals/eye clinics with the highest PE risk after registered cataract surgery had many cases of PE where the causative cataract operation was not registered with the NPR.
CONCLUSION: A few private hospitals/eye clinics had a statistically significantly higher PE risk than the PE risk at the eye departments in public hospitals. The lack of registration with the NPR by the private hospitals/eye clinics suggests that better monitoring of cataract surgery is needed in Denmark to reduce risk and to improve quality.
METHODS: Postoperative endophthalmitis cases were retrospectively identified via the NPR and chart review in order to confirm PE cases that had cataract surgery in the calendar period 2002-2010.
RESULTS: We identified 39 cases of PE after 107 701 registered public cataract operations; PE risk = 0.36 [corrected] per 1000 operations and 27 cases of PE after 36 760 registered private operations; PE risk = 0.73 [corrected] per 1000 operations. There was homogeneity in the PE risk among the eye departments in public hospitals (p = 0.6), but heterogeneity in the PE risk among the private hospitals/eye clinics (p = 0.0001). Six private hospitals/eye clinics had a statistically significantly higher PE risk compared with the eye departments in public hospitals. In all, 98% of public cataract surgery was registered in the NPR compared with 38% of private cataract surgery. The private hospitals/eye clinics with the highest PE risk after registered cataract surgery had many cases of PE where the causative cataract operation was not registered with the NPR.
CONCLUSION: A few private hospitals/eye clinics had a statistically significantly higher PE risk than the PE risk at the eye departments in public hospitals. The lack of registration with the NPR by the private hospitals/eye clinics suggests that better monitoring of cataract surgery is needed in Denmark to reduce risk and to improve quality.