MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2026.03.099

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of surgical research · 2026

Off the Books: A Scoping Review of the Minority Tax and Professional Advancement in Academic Surgery.

Istl Alexandra C, Daryanani Andrés, Olunuga Ebun, Kirpalani Amrit, Arora Tania K, Hu Yue-Yung, Alabi Olamide, Maduekwe Ugwuji N, Martin Allison N

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The minority tax is an understudied phenomenon by which underrepresented in medicine (URiM) physicians are more often responsible for nonpromotable activities: mentorship, education, outreach, and committee service. This review aims to summarize definitions of minority tax, explore its possible impact in academic surgery, and present gaps in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic search across SCOPUS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, and PsycINFO was conducted. Original research articles studying URiM individuals in academic medicine/surgery were eligible. A priori outcomes of interest were minority tax definition, promotable activities, detractors/facilitators, downstream impacts, and best practices for promotion related to the minority tax. Two reviewers independently screened records and abstracted data.

RESULTS

Of 1263 articles identified, 13 met inclusion criteria, with moderate agreement for full-text review (κ = 0.59). Five studies explicitly defined the minority tax. Commonly impacted promotable activities were scholarly output and speaking invitations. Detractors amplifying the perceived effect of the minority tax included lack of mentorship, stigmatization, and disproportionate burden of diversity, equity, and inclusion service; facilitators mitigating the minority tax included supportive leadership, mentorship, and formal recognition of diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. Downstream impacts were burnout, stigmatization, and hindered promotion. No studies explored depression/anxiety or substance abuse. Twelve studies proposed recommendations to mitigate minority tax in professional advancement, including faculty development, departmental reform, allyship/antiracism, and institutional resources.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the perceived impact of the minority tax, characterized by uncompensated service and disproportionate responsibilities for URiM faculty. Frameworks that equitably recognize faculty contributions and provide professional development resources are needed.

Для цитирования: Istl Alexandra C, Daryanani Andrés, Olunuga Ebun, Kirpalani Amrit, Arora Tania K, Hu Yue-Yung, Alabi Olamide, Maduekwe Ugwuji N, Martin Allison N. Off the Books: A Scoping Review of the Minority Tax and Professional Advancement in Academic Surgery.. The Journal of surgical research. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2026.03.099.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.