Journal of biomechanics · 2024
Aortic tissue stiffness and tensile strength are correlated with density changes following proteolytic treatment.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gueldner Pete H, Darvish Cyrus J, Chickanosky Isabelle K M, Ahlgren Emma E, Fortunato Ronald, Chung Timothy K, Rajagopal Keshava, Benjamin Chandler C, Maiti Spandan, Rajagopal Kumbakonam R, Vorp David A
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Dissection or rupture of the aorta is accompanied by high mortality rates, and there is a pressing need for better prediction of these events for improved patient management and clinical outcomes. Biomechanically, these events represent a situation wherein the locally acting wall stress exceed the local tissue strength. Based on recent reports for polymers, we hypothesized that aortic tissue failure strength and stiffness are directly associated with tissue mass density. The objective of this work was to test this novel hypothesis for porcine thoracic aorta.
METHODS: Three tissue specimens from freshly harvested porcine thoracic aorta were treated with either collagenase or elastase to selectively degrade structural proteins in the tissue, or with phosphate buffer saline (control). The tissue mass and volume of each specimen were measured before and after treatment to allow for density calculation, then mechanically tested to failure under uniaxial extension.
RESULTS: Protease treatments resulted in statistically significant tissue density reduction (sham vs. collagenase p = 0.02 and sham vs elastase p = 0.003), which in turn was significantly and directly correlated with both ultimate tensile strength (sham vs. collagenase p = 0.02 and sham vs elastase p = 0.03) and tangent modulus (sham vs. collagenase p = 0.007 and sham vs elastase p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates for the first time that tissue stiffness and tensile strength are directly correlated with tissue density in proteolytically-treated aorta. These findings constitute an important step towards understanding aortic tissue failure mechanisms and could potentially be leveraged for non-invasive aortic strength assessment through density measurements, which could have implications to clinical care.
METHODS: Three tissue specimens from freshly harvested porcine thoracic aorta were treated with either collagenase or elastase to selectively degrade structural proteins in the tissue, or with phosphate buffer saline (control). The tissue mass and volume of each specimen were measured before and after treatment to allow for density calculation, then mechanically tested to failure under uniaxial extension.
RESULTS: Protease treatments resulted in statistically significant tissue density reduction (sham vs. collagenase p = 0.02 and sham vs elastase p = 0.003), which in turn was significantly and directly correlated with both ultimate tensile strength (sham vs. collagenase p = 0.02 and sham vs elastase p = 0.03) and tangent modulus (sham vs. collagenase p = 0.007 and sham vs elastase p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates for the first time that tissue stiffness and tensile strength are directly correlated with tissue density in proteolytically-treated aorta. These findings constitute an important step towards understanding aortic tissue failure mechanisms and could potentially be leveraged for non-invasive aortic strength assessment through density measurements, which could have implications to clinical care.