Annals of surgery · 1997
Ileocolon interposition as a substitute stomach after total or proximal gastrectomy.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sakamoto T, Fujimaki M, Tazawa K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated ileocolon interposition as a substitute stomach after total gastrectomy (TG) or proximal gastrectomy (PG).
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although the jejunum frequently is used for reconstruction to create a substitute stomach after TG or PG, there are few reports on ileocolon interposition.
METHODS: The authors performed ileocolon interposition in 47 patients who underwent TG (N = 18) or PG (N = 29) for malignant gastric lesion and evaluated the function of this structure as a substitute stomach using esophagoscopy, manometry, pH-metry, emptying time, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and postoperative body weight changes.
RESULTS: No patient reported any reflux symptoms or showed endoscopic findings of reflux esophagitis. These results were well supported by manometry and acid loading pH-metry. Emptying time and OGTT showed good capacity as a reservoir of food, and the postoperative body weight averaged more than 90% of preoperative weight. Clinically, no significant difference between these two groups was recognized during long-term follow-up for up to 12 years after operation. There were no cases of direct operative death, and the 5- and 10-year survival rates were 64.7% and 40.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Ileocolon interposition after TG or PG has the advantages of preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis and of providing functional replacement of the stomach as a reservoir for ingested food.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although the jejunum frequently is used for reconstruction to create a substitute stomach after TG or PG, there are few reports on ileocolon interposition.
METHODS: The authors performed ileocolon interposition in 47 patients who underwent TG (N = 18) or PG (N = 29) for malignant gastric lesion and evaluated the function of this structure as a substitute stomach using esophagoscopy, manometry, pH-metry, emptying time, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and postoperative body weight changes.
RESULTS: No patient reported any reflux symptoms or showed endoscopic findings of reflux esophagitis. These results were well supported by manometry and acid loading pH-metry. Emptying time and OGTT showed good capacity as a reservoir of food, and the postoperative body weight averaged more than 90% of preoperative weight. Clinically, no significant difference between these two groups was recognized during long-term follow-up for up to 12 years after operation. There were no cases of direct operative death, and the 5- and 10-year survival rates were 64.7% and 40.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Ileocolon interposition after TG or PG has the advantages of preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis and of providing functional replacement of the stomach as a reservoir for ingested food.