Neuro-Chirurgie · 2021
Functional and dysfunctional impulsivities changes after subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kardous R, Joly H, Giordana B, Stefanini L, Mulliez A, Giordana C, Lemaire J-J, Fontaine D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We investigated changes of impulsivity after deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, distinguishing functional from dysfunctional impulsivity and their contributing factors.
METHODS: Data of 33 PD patients treated by STN-DBS were studied before and 6 months after surgery: motor impairment, medication (dose and dopaminergic agonists), cognition, mood and occurrence of impulse control disorders. Impulsivity was assessed by the Dickman Impulsivity Inventory, which distinguishes functional impulsivity (FI), reflecting the potential for reasoning and rapid action when the situation requires it, and dysfunctional impulsivity (DI), reflecting the lack of prior reasoning, even when the situation demands it. The location of DBS leads was studied on postoperative MRI using a deformable histological atlas and by compartmentalization of the STN.
RESULTS: After STN-DBS, DI was significantly increased (mean pre- and postoperative DI scores 1.9±1.6 and 3.5±2.4, P<0.001) although FI was not modified (mean pre- and postoperative FI scores 6.2±2.7 and 5.8±2.6). Factors associated with a DI score's increase≥2 (multivariable logistic regression model) were: low preoperative Frontal Assessment Battery score and location of the left active contact in the ventral part of the STN.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that STN-DBS may have a different impact on both dimensions of impulsivity, worsening pathological impulsivity without altering physiological impulsivity. The increase in dysfunctional impulsivity may be favoured by the location of the electrode in the ventral part of the STN.
METHODS: Data of 33 PD patients treated by STN-DBS were studied before and 6 months after surgery: motor impairment, medication (dose and dopaminergic agonists), cognition, mood and occurrence of impulse control disorders. Impulsivity was assessed by the Dickman Impulsivity Inventory, which distinguishes functional impulsivity (FI), reflecting the potential for reasoning and rapid action when the situation requires it, and dysfunctional impulsivity (DI), reflecting the lack of prior reasoning, even when the situation demands it. The location of DBS leads was studied on postoperative MRI using a deformable histological atlas and by compartmentalization of the STN.
RESULTS: After STN-DBS, DI was significantly increased (mean pre- and postoperative DI scores 1.9±1.6 and 3.5±2.4, P<0.001) although FI was not modified (mean pre- and postoperative FI scores 6.2±2.7 and 5.8±2.6). Factors associated with a DI score's increase≥2 (multivariable logistic regression model) were: low preoperative Frontal Assessment Battery score and location of the left active contact in the ventral part of the STN.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that STN-DBS may have a different impact on both dimensions of impulsivity, worsening pathological impulsivity without altering physiological impulsivity. The increase in dysfunctional impulsivity may be favoured by the location of the electrode in the ventral part of the STN.