Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026
Environmental impact of cataract surgery and strategies for mitigation: a life cycle assessment in an academic hospital.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kooistra Emma J, Golsteijn Laura, van Bree Egid M, Elferink Sjoerd, Brakema Evelyn A, Hermeling Floris, Hemelaar Pleun, Ottenbros Anne, Crama Niels, van Zelm Rosalie, Touw Hugo R W, Stobernack Tim
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To identify the main environmental hotspots of cataract surgery and evaluates strategies to reduce its environmental impact and to compare process-based and monetary value-based methodologies for environmental assessment.
SETTING: Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
DESIGN: Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) following ISO 14040/44 guidelines.
METHODS: The environmental impact of phacoemulsification cataract surgery was assessed, including all processes, products, and equipment used in the operating room. Key contributors to human health and ecosystem damage were identified. A monetary value-based analysis was performed using the same inventory data to compare methodological approaches.
RESULTS: Disposables (35%) and patient travel (31%) were the largest contributors to the environmental impact. Immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) reduced the impact by 19%, and simplifying surgical kits achieved a 10% reduction. Additional reductions were observed with renewable energy (-12%) and sustainable transportation (-8%). The monetary value-based approach yielded a fourfold higher carbon footprint than the process-based LCA, while identifying similar hotspots.
CONCLUSIONS: The main environmental hotspots of cataract surgery were patient travel and disposable products. The most effective mitigation strategy to reduce the carbon footprint is implementing ISBCS. Additional mitigation strategies include reducing the use of disposable products, encouraging sustainable travel options, and switching to renewable energy. These findings highlight opportunities for ophthalmologists to contribute to more sustainable surgical care.
SETTING: Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
DESIGN: Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) following ISO 14040/44 guidelines.
METHODS: The environmental impact of phacoemulsification cataract surgery was assessed, including all processes, products, and equipment used in the operating room. Key contributors to human health and ecosystem damage were identified. A monetary value-based analysis was performed using the same inventory data to compare methodological approaches.
RESULTS: Disposables (35%) and patient travel (31%) were the largest contributors to the environmental impact. Immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) reduced the impact by 19%, and simplifying surgical kits achieved a 10% reduction. Additional reductions were observed with renewable energy (-12%) and sustainable transportation (-8%). The monetary value-based approach yielded a fourfold higher carbon footprint than the process-based LCA, while identifying similar hotspots.
CONCLUSIONS: The main environmental hotspots of cataract surgery were patient travel and disposable products. The most effective mitigation strategy to reduce the carbon footprint is implementing ISBCS. Additional mitigation strategies include reducing the use of disposable products, encouraging sustainable travel options, and switching to renewable energy. These findings highlight opportunities for ophthalmologists to contribute to more sustainable surgical care.