MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000458

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of lower genital tract disease · 2019

International Anal Neoplasia Society Guidelines for the Practice of Digital Anal Rectal Examination.

Hillman Richard John, Berry-Lawhorn J Michael, Ong Jason J, Cuming Tamzin, Nathan Mayura, Goldstone Stephen, Richel Olivier, Barrosso Luis F, Darragh Teresa M, Law Carmella, Bouchard Céline, Stier Elizabeth A, Palefsky Joel M, Jay Naomi, International Anal Neoplasia Society

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to develop recommended techniques and quality assurance metrics for the practice of Digital Anal Rectal Examination (DARE).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The International Anal Neoplasia Society undertook a literature review and, using the AGREE II technique, developed guidelines for performing DARE.

RESULTS

A consensus was formed regarding the optimum conditions and characteristics of DARE. Several Quality Assurance metrics were developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital Anal Rectal Examination is a cheap and potentially universally available technique, which has the potential to facilitate the early diagnosis of anal cancers, when they are most amenable to treatment. These guidelines provide a basis for teaching the technique and may be used as for evaluation research.

Для цитирования: Hillman Richard John, Berry-Lawhorn J Michael, Ong Jason J, Cuming Tamzin, Nathan Mayura, Goldstone Stephen, Richel Olivier, Barrosso Luis F, Darragh Teresa M, Law Carmella, Bouchard Céline, Stier Elizabeth A, Palefsky Joel M, Jay Naomi, International Anal Neoplasia Society. International Anal Neoplasia Society Guidelines for the Practice of Digital Anal Rectal Examination.. Journal of lower genital tract disease. 2019. DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000458.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.