MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/02841851231176272

Медицинская библиотека · Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2023

Screening outcome for interpretation by the first and second reader in a population-based mammographic screening program with independent double reading.

Hovda Tone, Sagstad Silje, Larsen Marthe, Chen Yan, Hofvind Solveig

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Double reading of screening mammograms is associated with a higher rate of screen-detected cancer than single reading, but different strategies exist regarding reader pairing and blinding. Knowledge about these aspects is important when considering strategies for future use of artificial intelligence in mammographic screening.

PURPOSE: To investigate screening outcome, histopathological tumor characteristics, and mammographic features stratified by the first and the second reader in a population based screening program for breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

The study sample consisted of data from 3,499,048 screening examinations from 834,691 women performed during 1996-2018 in BreastScreen Norway. All examinations were interpreted independently by two radiologists, 272 in total. We analyzed interpretation score, recall, and cancer detection, as well as histopathological tumor characteristics and mammographic features of the cancers, stratified by the first and second readers.

RESULTS

For Reader 1, the rate of positive interpretations was 4.8%, recall 2.3%, and cancer detection 0.5%. The corresponding percentages for Reader 2 were 4.9%, 2.5%, and 0.5% (P < 0.05 compared with Reader 1). No statistical difference was observed for histopathological tumor characteristics or mammographic features when stratified by Readers 1 and 2. Recall and cancer detection were statistically higher and histopathological tumor characteristics less favorable for cases detected after concordant positive compared with discordant interpretations.

CONCLUSION

Despite reaching statistical significance, mainly due to the large study sample, we consider the differences in interpretation scores, recall, and cancer detection between the first and second readers to be clinically negligible. For practical and clinical purposes, double reading in BreastScreen Norway is independent.

Для цитирования: Hovda Tone, Sagstad Silje, Larsen Marthe, Chen Yan, Hofvind Solveig. Screening outcome for interpretation by the first and second reader in a population-based mammographic screening program with independent double reading.. Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987). 2023. DOI: 10.1177/02841851231176272.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.