Cavernous segment internal carotid artery stenosis specific to meningiomas compared to pituitary adenomas.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pituitary macroadenomas and meningiomas are common neoplasms arising within the cavernous sinus. Imaging characteristics on MRI can often distinguish these tumors from one another; however, some cases may be more difficult to differentiate. This study compares patterns of cavernous segment internal carotid artery (CS-ICA) stenosis between the two tumor types to establish a novel radiographic method of differentiation.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of patients with pathology-confirmed meningioma and pituitary adenomas at Tufts Medical Center was performed. The diameter of the CS-ICA at the narrowest point within the cavernous sinus was measured and compared to the ipsilateral petrous segment ICA and contralateral CS-ICA. The mean and range of percent stenosis and frequency of cases of CS-ICA stenosis >15% were determined. Statistical analysis to compare the groups was conducted using the Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and t-test.
RESULTS
There were a total of 78 out of 231 patients who were included in the study. The mean % ICA stenosis for all meningiomas was 9.3%, with increasing stenosis with increasing World Health Organization grade. Of all meningioma cases, 13 (33%) had greater than 15% ICA stenosis. Mean ICA stenosis for pituitary adenomas was -1.48%. There were no cases of pituitary adenomas causing ICA stenosis >15%.
CONCLUSIONS
Differentiating pituitary adenomas and intracavernous meningioma tumors can have important implications on surgical approach and outcome. Our study found that stenosis of the CS-ICA greater than 15% is highly specific to meningiomas and can serve as a radiologic sign to distinguish between these two tumors.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.