Surgical endoscopy · 2022
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic pyloric balloon dilation in patients with refractory gastroparesis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Soliman Heithem, Oiknine Elsa, Cohen-Sors Boris, Moszkowicz David, Gorbatchef Caroline, Dior Marie, Nebunu Nicoleta, Le Gall Maude, Coffin Benoit, Duboc Henri
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There has been interest in the use of pyloric therapies for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis. However, data on endoscopic pyloric dilation are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of this procedure in refractory gastroparesis.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 47 patients referred for refractory gastroparesis, confirmed by gastric emptying scintigraphy, and treated with endoscopic pyloric through-the-scope balloon dilation. The primary endpoint was the effectiveness of the procedure, evaluated with the Gastric Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) at 2 and 6 months.
RESULTS: A clinical response, defined by a 1.0 point decrease in the GCSI score, was observed in 25 patients at 2 months (53%) and in 19 patients at 6 months (40%). The mean GCSI score decreased significantly at 2 and 6 months compared to the preoperative score (3.9 ± 0.87 vs 2.3 ± 1.37 and 3.9 ± 0.87 vs 2.9 ± 1.27, respectively; p < 0.0001). No complication was observed. Nine patients had a delayed relapse at 1 year. A second dilation was performed for eight patients and it was effective in five of them (63%). The mean follow-up time of the patients was 27.0 ± 10.4 months. At 2 years, 15 patients still experienced improvement following this treatment (32%). No predictive factor of clinical response was identified.
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of pyloric dilation is 53% at 2 months, with sustained improvement in one third of patients at 2 years. This treatment should be considered as an alternative option to pyloromyotomy.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 47 patients referred for refractory gastroparesis, confirmed by gastric emptying scintigraphy, and treated with endoscopic pyloric through-the-scope balloon dilation. The primary endpoint was the effectiveness of the procedure, evaluated with the Gastric Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) at 2 and 6 months.
RESULTS: A clinical response, defined by a 1.0 point decrease in the GCSI score, was observed in 25 patients at 2 months (53%) and in 19 patients at 6 months (40%). The mean GCSI score decreased significantly at 2 and 6 months compared to the preoperative score (3.9 ± 0.87 vs 2.3 ± 1.37 and 3.9 ± 0.87 vs 2.9 ± 1.27, respectively; p < 0.0001). No complication was observed. Nine patients had a delayed relapse at 1 year. A second dilation was performed for eight patients and it was effective in five of them (63%). The mean follow-up time of the patients was 27.0 ± 10.4 months. At 2 years, 15 patients still experienced improvement following this treatment (32%). No predictive factor of clinical response was identified.
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of pyloric dilation is 53% at 2 months, with sustained improvement in one third of patients at 2 years. This treatment should be considered as an alternative option to pyloromyotomy.