MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s40261-012-0021-5

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical drug investigation · 2013

Fungal meningitis in an immunocompetent patient.

Louro Ricardo, Ferreira Rui, Pinheiro Catarina, Parada Helena, Faria Domitília, Monteiro Edmeia

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Cryptococcal meningitis is a rare entity among immunocompetent hosts but, when it occurs, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Clinical presentation as well as the course of the disease is usually subtle and indolent with headache and altered mental status. The authors present the case of a 59-year-old man, who sought medical help with a 2-week history of headaches accompanied by nausea and visual and hearing disturbances. On admission the patient was afebrile, presented visual and hearing deficits and had a normal magnetic resonance image of the brain. A lumbar puncture was performed and microscopic examination of the cerebrospinal fluid revealed yeasts that were identified as Cryptococcus spp. and later, by means of molecular biology techniques, as Cryptococcus neoformans, var. grubii. The patient was treated with liposomal amphotericin B plus fluconazole for 28 weeks. At follow-up after 1 year the patient was asymptomatic and received fluconazole 400 mg/day as prophylactic therapy. The outcome of Cryptococcus infections in immunocompetent hosts is reported to be poor as a result of a delayed diagnosis and suboptimal initial antifungal therapy. The influence of the normal immune response is unclear.

Для цитирования: Louro Ricardo, Ferreira Rui, Pinheiro Catarina, Parada Helena, Faria Domitília, Monteiro Edmeia. Fungal meningitis in an immunocompetent patient.. Clinical drug investigation. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s40261-012-0021-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.