European radiology · 2013
Computed diffusion-weighted imaging using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ueno Yoshiko, Takahashi Satoru, Kitajima Kazuhiro, Kimura Tokunori, Aoki Ikuo, Kawakami Fumi, Miyake Hideaki, Ohno Yoshiharu, Sugimura Kazuro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of computed diffusion-weighted images (cDWIs) of b = 2000 s/mm(2) (cDWI2000) generated from DWIs of b = 0 and 1000 for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis in comparison with that of measured original DWIs of b = 1000 (mDWI1000) and b = 2000(mDWI2000) using 3-T MRI.
METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent a preoperative MRI examination, including T2WI and DWI (b = 0, 1000, 2000 s/mm(2)), were enrolled in this study. Four combinations of images, protocol A (T2WI alone), B (T2WI + mDWI1000), C (T2WI + mDWI2000) and D (T2WI + cDWI2000), were assessed for their diagnostic capability. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) and diagnostic performance were evaluated, as well as contrast ratios (CR) between cancerous and non-cancerous lesions for each DWI.
RESULTS: The highest CR was obtained with cDWI2000 (0.29 ± 0.16). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Az of the protocols were: A: 66.3 %, 59.4 %, 63.0 %, 0.67; B: 82.6 %, 62.0 %, 72.5 %, 0.80; C: 84.1 %, 66.5 %, 75.5 %, 0.86; D: 83.2 %, 70.0 %, 76.6 %, and 0.84, respectively The specificities and accuracies of protocol C and D were significantly higher than those of protocol B (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: cDWI2000 appears to be more effective than mDWI1000, and at least as effective as mDWI2000 for PCa diagnosis.
METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent a preoperative MRI examination, including T2WI and DWI (b = 0, 1000, 2000 s/mm(2)), were enrolled in this study. Four combinations of images, protocol A (T2WI alone), B (T2WI + mDWI1000), C (T2WI + mDWI2000) and D (T2WI + cDWI2000), were assessed for their diagnostic capability. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) and diagnostic performance were evaluated, as well as contrast ratios (CR) between cancerous and non-cancerous lesions for each DWI.
RESULTS: The highest CR was obtained with cDWI2000 (0.29 ± 0.16). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Az of the protocols were: A: 66.3 %, 59.4 %, 63.0 %, 0.67; B: 82.6 %, 62.0 %, 72.5 %, 0.80; C: 84.1 %, 66.5 %, 75.5 %, 0.86; D: 83.2 %, 70.0 %, 76.6 %, and 0.84, respectively The specificities and accuracies of protocol C and D were significantly higher than those of protocol B (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: cDWI2000 appears to be more effective than mDWI1000, and at least as effective as mDWI2000 for PCa diagnosis.