Fertility and sterility · 2004
A prospective, randomized study comparing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus fenestration and coagulation in patients with endometriomas.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alborzi Saeed, Momtahan Mozhdeh, Parsanezhad Mohammad Ebrahim, Dehbashi Sedigheh, Zolghadri Jaleh, Alborzi Soroosh
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference between two laparoscopic methods for the management of endometriomas with regard to recurrence of signs and symptoms and pregnancy rate.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Infertility and gynecologic endoscopy units of two medical university hospitals.
PATIENT(S): One hundred patients with endometriomas who had either infertility or pelvic pain.
INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomly divided into two groups; one group underwent cystectomy (group 1), and fenestration and coagulation were performed for the other (group 2).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A comparison of recurrence of signs and symptoms of endometriomas and pregnancy rates in two groups.
RESULT(S): Fifty-two patients were studied in group 1 and 48 in group 2. The recurrence of symptoms, such as pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea, was 15.8% in group 1 and 56.7% in group 2 after 2 years. The rate of reoperation was 5.8% in group 1 and 22.9% in group 2 and these differences were statistically significant. The cumulative pregnancy rate was significantly higher in group 1 (59.4%) than in group 2 (23.3%) at 1-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION(S): Laparoscopic cystectomy of endometriomas is a better choice than fenestration and coagulation because the former technique leads to a lower recurrence of signs and symptoms and a lower rate of reoperation and a higher cumulative pregnancy rate than the latter.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Infertility and gynecologic endoscopy units of two medical university hospitals.
PATIENT(S): One hundred patients with endometriomas who had either infertility or pelvic pain.
INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomly divided into two groups; one group underwent cystectomy (group 1), and fenestration and coagulation were performed for the other (group 2).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A comparison of recurrence of signs and symptoms of endometriomas and pregnancy rates in two groups.
RESULT(S): Fifty-two patients were studied in group 1 and 48 in group 2. The recurrence of symptoms, such as pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea, was 15.8% in group 1 and 56.7% in group 2 after 2 years. The rate of reoperation was 5.8% in group 1 and 22.9% in group 2 and these differences were statistically significant. The cumulative pregnancy rate was significantly higher in group 1 (59.4%) than in group 2 (23.3%) at 1-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION(S): Laparoscopic cystectomy of endometriomas is a better choice than fenestration and coagulation because the former technique leads to a lower recurrence of signs and symptoms and a lower rate of reoperation and a higher cumulative pregnancy rate than the latter.