American journal of ophthalmology · 2025
The Effect of Semaglutide and GLP-1 RAs on Risk of Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abbass Nadia J, Nahlawi Raya, Shaia Jacqueline K, Allan Kevin C, Kaelber David C, Talcott Katherine E, Singh Rishi P
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The association between GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) remains unclear. Given the debilitating sequelae of NAION and rapid increase of GLP-1RA use, further research is essential to investigate this potential relationship. This study seeks to determine the risk of NAION and ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) in patients prescribed GLP-1RAs.
DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort study.
SETTING: TriNetX United States collaborative network.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥12 years old with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and considered overweight or obese (high BMI), with at least one ophthalmology or neurology visit. Among T2DM patients, approximately 120,000 patients with a semaglutide prescription and 220,000 prescribed any GLP-1RA were compared to matched T2DM controls. Among high BMI patients, approximately 58,000 on semaglutide and 66,000 on any GLP-1RA were compared to matched controls.
METHODS: Patients prescribed semaglutide or any GLP-1RA were compared with those on non-GLP-1RA medications. Populations were propensity matched (1:1) on various demographic and risk factors to balance baseline cohorts.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cumulative incidence and risk of NAION and ION. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported, with significance defined as CI <0.9 or > 1.1.
RESULTS: In T2DM patients prescribed semaglutide, the risk of NAION (RR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.523-0.937) and ION (RR = 0.788, 95% CI: 0.609-1.102) after 5 years was not significantly increased compared to matched T2DM controls. Similarly, T2DM patients on any GLP-1RA demonstrated no significant difference in the risk of NAION (RR = 0.887, 95% CI: 0.735-1.071) or ION (RR = 0.969, 95% CI: 0.813-1.154) compared to controls. Furthermore, no increased risk of either outcome was found in the high BMI groups prescribed semaglutide or any GLP-1RA. The cumulative 5-year risk of NAION and ION in T2DM patients on semaglutide was 0.065% and 0.08%, respectively. In those with high BMI prescribed semaglutide, the risk of NAION and ION after 2 years was 0.038% and 0.404%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant increase in risk of NAION or ION in patients taking semaglutide or GLP-1RAs compared to T2DM or high BMI controls.
DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort study.
SETTING: TriNetX United States collaborative network.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥12 years old with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and considered overweight or obese (high BMI), with at least one ophthalmology or neurology visit. Among T2DM patients, approximately 120,000 patients with a semaglutide prescription and 220,000 prescribed any GLP-1RA were compared to matched T2DM controls. Among high BMI patients, approximately 58,000 on semaglutide and 66,000 on any GLP-1RA were compared to matched controls.
METHODS: Patients prescribed semaglutide or any GLP-1RA were compared with those on non-GLP-1RA medications. Populations were propensity matched (1:1) on various demographic and risk factors to balance baseline cohorts.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cumulative incidence and risk of NAION and ION. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported, with significance defined as CI <0.9 or > 1.1.
RESULTS: In T2DM patients prescribed semaglutide, the risk of NAION (RR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.523-0.937) and ION (RR = 0.788, 95% CI: 0.609-1.102) after 5 years was not significantly increased compared to matched T2DM controls. Similarly, T2DM patients on any GLP-1RA demonstrated no significant difference in the risk of NAION (RR = 0.887, 95% CI: 0.735-1.071) or ION (RR = 0.969, 95% CI: 0.813-1.154) compared to controls. Furthermore, no increased risk of either outcome was found in the high BMI groups prescribed semaglutide or any GLP-1RA. The cumulative 5-year risk of NAION and ION in T2DM patients on semaglutide was 0.065% and 0.08%, respectively. In those with high BMI prescribed semaglutide, the risk of NAION and ION after 2 years was 0.038% and 0.404%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant increase in risk of NAION or ION in patients taking semaglutide or GLP-1RAs compared to T2DM or high BMI controls.