European journal of radiology · 2012
Portomesenteric venous gas: is gas distribution linked to etiology and outcome?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Heye Tobias, Bernhard Michael, Mehrabi Arianeb, Kauczor Hans-Ulrich, Hosch Waldemar
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate various anatomical locations of portomesenteric venous gas detected by computed tomography (CT) and their relationship with the underlying etiology and the outcome.
METHODS: The study group consisted of 47 cases with evidence of portomesenteric venous gas detected on abdominal CT examinations, 12 cases were identified through a retrospective PACS search, 35 were prospectively included. The presence of gas at specific anatomical locations in the portomesenteric venous vasculature was assessed according to a pre-defined classification: the arcade vessels close to the bowel segments followed by segmental vessels, the superior mesenteric vein, the extra- and intrahepatic portal vein. The etiology of portomesenteric venous gas and its prognosis were assessed by review of surgical reports, histopathology and medical records. Surgery was performed on 30 patients.
RESULTS: Overall 68.1% of cases were of ischemic etiology. Gas present in the arcade vessels was the best indicator for ischemia (sensitivity 93.8%; specificity 70.0%, positive predictive value 90.9%, negative predictive value 77.8%) compared to other locations and the mere presence of portomesenteric gas independent from the location. The overall mortality rate was 53.2%. Only gas in the arcade and segmental vessels were associated with considerably higher mortality rates (65.8% and 75.0%, respectively) and acceptable frequency (occurrence in 80.9% and 59.6%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that the presence of gas at specific anatomical locations in the portomesenteric venous system, namely the arcade and segmental vessels, may serve as strong indicator for ischemic etiology and poor prognosis in the assessment of individual cases.
METHODS: The study group consisted of 47 cases with evidence of portomesenteric venous gas detected on abdominal CT examinations, 12 cases were identified through a retrospective PACS search, 35 were prospectively included. The presence of gas at specific anatomical locations in the portomesenteric venous vasculature was assessed according to a pre-defined classification: the arcade vessels close to the bowel segments followed by segmental vessels, the superior mesenteric vein, the extra- and intrahepatic portal vein. The etiology of portomesenteric venous gas and its prognosis were assessed by review of surgical reports, histopathology and medical records. Surgery was performed on 30 patients.
RESULTS: Overall 68.1% of cases were of ischemic etiology. Gas present in the arcade vessels was the best indicator for ischemia (sensitivity 93.8%; specificity 70.0%, positive predictive value 90.9%, negative predictive value 77.8%) compared to other locations and the mere presence of portomesenteric gas independent from the location. The overall mortality rate was 53.2%. Only gas in the arcade and segmental vessels were associated with considerably higher mortality rates (65.8% and 75.0%, respectively) and acceptable frequency (occurrence in 80.9% and 59.6%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that the presence of gas at specific anatomical locations in the portomesenteric venous system, namely the arcade and segmental vessels, may serve as strong indicator for ischemic etiology and poor prognosis in the assessment of individual cases.