Comparison of Antigen Conjugation to a Peptidic Carrier or to Bovine Serum Albumin in the Serodiagnosis of Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis via Suspension Array Technology.
Аннотация
Backgroud/
Objectives
Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis (CVL), caused by Leishmania infantum, is a significant public health concern due to dogs serving as reservoirs for human infection. An accurate and rapid diagnostic method to distinguish symptomatic and asymptomatic CVL from healthy and vaccinated animals is essential for controlling canine and human disease. Developing innovative antibody detection techniques and exploring new antigens are essential for enhancing CVL testing efficiency. Our study focuses on a multiplex flow cytometry technique to detect Leishmania-specific antibodies in canine serum. This involved conjugating small peptides with carrier proteins or peptide tags, sequences designed to facilitate bead coupling.
Methods
A peptide from the L. infantum A2 protein was coupled to beads in three forms: unconjugated, conjugated with BSA, and conjugated with a C-terminal β-alanine-lysine (x4)-cysteine TAG. This TAG was previously designed to enhance peptide solubility, improve binding efficiency, and provide functional groups for covalent attachment to the beads, ensuring stable immobilization in the multiplex assay.
Results
Our results suggest that the multiplex approach shows promise as a rapid serological test for CVL, particularly with TAG-conjugated peptides, which optimize bead coupling. However, peptide/BSA conjugation revealed anti-BSA antibodies in samples from healthy and CVL dogs.
Conclusions
In conclusion, our findings highlight the potential of multiplex methodologies to enhance CVL diagnostics and caution against using BSA as a bead coupling agent in serological tests for canine samples due to its impact on test specificity and sensitivity.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.