MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.08.011

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2017

Anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A meta-analysis of executive functioning.

Hirst Rayna B, Beard Charlotte L, Colby Katrina A, Quittner Zoe, Mills Brent M, Lavender Jason M

СтатьяМетаанализОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Research investigating the link between eating disorder (ED) diagnosis and executive dysfunction has had conflicting results, yet no meta-analyses have examined the overall association of ED pathology with executive functioning (EF).

METHOD: Effect sizes were extracted from 32 studies comparing ED groups (27 of anorexia nervosa, 9 of bulimia nervosa) with controls to determine the grand mean effect on EF. Analyses included effects for individual EF measures, as well as an age-based subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

There was a medium effect of ED diagnosis on executive functioning, with bulimia nervosa demonstrating a larger effect (Hedges's g=-0.70) than anorexia nervosa (g=-0.41). Within anorexia nervosa studies, subgroup analyses were conducted for age and diagnostic subtype. The effect of anorexia nervosa on EF was largest in adults; however, subgroup differences for age were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Anorexia and bulimia nervosa are associated with EF deficits, which are particularly notable for individuals with bulimia nervosa. The present analysis includes recommendations for future studies regarding study design and EF measurement.

Для цитирования: Hirst Rayna B, Beard Charlotte L, Colby Katrina A, Quittner Zoe, Mills Brent M, Lavender Jason M. Anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A meta-analysis of executive functioning.. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.08.011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.