Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2017
Prevalence of Oral Mucosal Lesions among Dental Patients with Mixed Habits in Salem District - A Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Karthik R, Mohan N
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The practice of betel nut chewing with or without tobacco is still practiced in south india, salem inspite of its harmful effects.
METHODOLOGY: 200 Patients visiting the outpatient department, Oral medicine and radiology from Aug 2015 to Aug 2016.
RESULT AND CONCLUSION: In our study, 3 women were exclusively churut smokers. Thirty-eight percent of the dental patients were beedi smoker, 32% were tobacco chewers, 12% were both betel nut and tobacco chewers, 8% were exclusively betel nut chewers, 1% of the dental population were exclusively churut smokers. Mean age group of the study population is 50.2 (14.4). There are 28 females and 172 males in the study group. Chi-square test revealed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001) between males and females based on soft-tissue findings and no statistically significant difference (P = 0.572) between males and females based on distribution of hard-tissue findings.
METHODOLOGY: 200 Patients visiting the outpatient department, Oral medicine and radiology from Aug 2015 to Aug 2016.
RESULT AND CONCLUSION: In our study, 3 women were exclusively churut smokers. Thirty-eight percent of the dental patients were beedi smoker, 32% were tobacco chewers, 12% were both betel nut and tobacco chewers, 8% were exclusively betel nut chewers, 1% of the dental population were exclusively churut smokers. Mean age group of the study population is 50.2 (14.4). There are 28 females and 172 males in the study group. Chi-square test revealed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001) between males and females based on soft-tissue findings and no statistically significant difference (P = 0.572) between males and females based on distribution of hard-tissue findings.