BMC cancer · 2025
Rapid identification of tumor patients with PG-SGA ≥ 4 based on machine learning: a prospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qian Gui, Jiaxin Huang, Minghua Cong, Beijia Liu, Yinfeng Li, Guiyu Huang, Mingxue Yang, Xiaoli Tang, Hongyan Yan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in cancer patients and worsens treatment and prognosis. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is the best tool to evaluate malnutrition, but it is complicated has limited its routine clinical use.
METHODS: We reviewed 798 records from 416 cancer patients treated at our hospital from July 2022 to March 2024. We used machine learning methods like XGBoost and Random Forest to find important factors linked to PG-SGA scores of 4 or higher. We confirmed the most important factors with logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Among all models, XGBoost and Random Forest models perform the best, with the area under the curve (AUC) reaching of 0.75 and 0.77. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.66-0.99; P = 0.045), handgrip strength (HGS) (OR = 0.89, 95%CI 0.82-0.96; P = 0.004), fat-free mass index (FFMI) (OR = 1.36, 95%CI 1.01-1.88; P = 0.045), and bedridden status (OR = 3.16, 95%CI 1.17-9.14; P = 0.026) as key predictors for PG-SGA scores of ≥ 4.
CONCLUSION: BMI, HGS, FFMI, and bedridden status were identified as practical indicators to efficiently screen patients likely to have PG-SGA scores ≥ 4.
METHODS: We reviewed 798 records from 416 cancer patients treated at our hospital from July 2022 to March 2024. We used machine learning methods like XGBoost and Random Forest to find important factors linked to PG-SGA scores of 4 or higher. We confirmed the most important factors with logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Among all models, XGBoost and Random Forest models perform the best, with the area under the curve (AUC) reaching of 0.75 and 0.77. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.66-0.99; P = 0.045), handgrip strength (HGS) (OR = 0.89, 95%CI 0.82-0.96; P = 0.004), fat-free mass index (FFMI) (OR = 1.36, 95%CI 1.01-1.88; P = 0.045), and bedridden status (OR = 3.16, 95%CI 1.17-9.14; P = 0.026) as key predictors for PG-SGA scores of ≥ 4.
CONCLUSION: BMI, HGS, FFMI, and bedridden status were identified as practical indicators to efficiently screen patients likely to have PG-SGA scores ≥ 4.