DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2026.07.057
Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Voice Across Different Degrees of Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether increasing severity of untreated bilateral sensorineural hearing loss is associated with severity-related alterations in perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, videolaryngostroboscopic, and patient-reported voice outcomes.
METHODS
This prospective cross-sectional study included 150 adults allocated equally to five hearing-threshold groups: normal hearing (<25 dB HL), mild hearing loss (26-40 dB HL), moderate hearing loss (41-55 dB HL), moderately severe hearing loss (56-70 dB HL), and severe hearing loss (71-90 dB HL). Voice evaluation included GRBAS ratings, videolaryngostroboscopy, maximum phonation time, s/z ratio, acoustic analysis, and the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). Overall group comparisons used the Kruskal-Wallis H test or chi-square tests. Dunn-Bonferroni tests were used for post-hoc comparisons. Spearman correlation assessed ordered trends, and age- and sex-adjusted regression analyses evaluated independent associations.
RESULTS
Voice complaints (Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact P < 0.001), shouting behavior (Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact P < 0.001), and vocal loudness category (χ²(8) = 21.11, P = 0.007) differed among groups and were most prominent in Group 5. Videolaryngostroboscopic regularity (H(4) = 18.99, P < 0.001), GRBAS total score (H(4) = 18.35, P = 0.001), fundamental frequency (H(4) = 22.36, P < 0.001), and VHI-10 (H(4) = 16.99, P = 0.002) also differed among groups. Ordered associations were observed for vibratory irregularity (ρ = 0.288), GRBAS total score (ρ = 0.281), fundamental frequency (ρ = 0.350), and VHI-10 (ρ = 0.263; all P ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Greater hearing-loss severity was associated with subtle but measurable changes in perceptual voice quality, vibratory regularity, pitch, and self-reported voice handicap. These findings demonstrate association rather than causation; impaired auditory feedback is a plausible mechanism that requires confirmation in longitudinal or interventional studies.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.