MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.47158

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2023

Lacertus Fibrosus Syndrome: A Case Report.

Gupta Pranav, Gupta Dhananjay, Shrivastav Sandeep

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Lacertus fibrosus syndrome is described as compression of the median nerve, which takes place beneath a layer of ligamentous tissue (lacertus fibrosus, also known as bicipital aponeurosis) slightly beyond the elbow joint. Both sexes can develop lacertus fibrosus syndrome, most often after the age of 35. The possible risk factors are repetition of movements, overwork, and manual work while the forearm is pronated. Lacertus fibrosus syndrome presents a distinct diagnostic challenge because it is a somewhat unknown and non-documented disease. Its symptoms are often mistaken for those of carpal tunnel syndrome, which complicates the differential diagnosis and management of the patient. All patients who report tingling, numbness, loss of strength, muscle loss, manual endurance, or dexterity should be investigated and tested for both carpal tunnel syndrome and lacertus syndrome. Here, a case of a 43-year-old woman is discussed, who presented with chief complaints of pain and tingling sensation in the left upper limb, which was associated with loss of thumb pinch grip. The pain was aggravated with elbow extension and relieved with rest. The patient underwent left elbow median nerve decompression and was discharged in steady condition. This case report highlights the accurate clinical presentation and surgical intervention for the syndrome, for which the outcome turned out to be satisfying.

Для цитирования: Gupta Pranav, Gupta Dhananjay, Shrivastav Sandeep. Lacertus Fibrosus Syndrome: A Case Report.. Cureus. 2023. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47158.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.