Ophthalmic research · 2019
Sensitive Assessment of Acute Optic Neuritis by a New, Digital Flicker Test.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pihl-Jensen Gorm, Ivanov Iliya, Hinze Desiree, Trauzettel-Klosinski Susanne, Frederiksen Jette Lautrup
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Aulhorn flicker test (AFT) previously showed promise in diagnosing acute optic neuritis (ON) albeit with suboptimal sensitivity. A new, digitalized version of the AFT (the DFT) has not previously been examined in acute ON.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of the DFT in acute ON.
METHOD: The DFT assesses the subjective brightness of a flickering field (1-60 Hz). In normal subjects, brightness enhancement occurs at intermediate frequencies, whereas in acute ON darkness enhancement (DE) is hypothesized. AFT and DFT measurements were obtained in acute ON patients (≤31 days from first symptom) with DE as a quantitative covariate. Reproducibility of the DFT end point was assessed in the form of an intraclass correlation.
RESULTS: 30 untreated first-time acute ON patients and 55 healthy controls were examined. AFT and DFT were performed 12.7 days (range: 4-30) following ON onset. The DFT showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.78-0.99) to a specificity of 0.96 (95% CI = 0.87-1.00). The AFT showed a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI = 0.56-0.90) to a specificity of 1.00 (95% CI = 0.93-1.00). No significant correlation was shown between DFT and visual acuity. The intraclass correlation of the DFT end point in healthy subjects was 0.84.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a new DFT in acute ON displaying a high specificity of 0.96 and a sensitivity of 0.93. Our study indicates the DFT to be an accurate and easy-to-use tool in diagnosing acute ON, which may be especially helpful in atypical cases.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of the DFT in acute ON.
METHOD: The DFT assesses the subjective brightness of a flickering field (1-60 Hz). In normal subjects, brightness enhancement occurs at intermediate frequencies, whereas in acute ON darkness enhancement (DE) is hypothesized. AFT and DFT measurements were obtained in acute ON patients (≤31 days from first symptom) with DE as a quantitative covariate. Reproducibility of the DFT end point was assessed in the form of an intraclass correlation.
RESULTS: 30 untreated first-time acute ON patients and 55 healthy controls were examined. AFT and DFT were performed 12.7 days (range: 4-30) following ON onset. The DFT showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.78-0.99) to a specificity of 0.96 (95% CI = 0.87-1.00). The AFT showed a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI = 0.56-0.90) to a specificity of 1.00 (95% CI = 0.93-1.00). No significant correlation was shown between DFT and visual acuity. The intraclass correlation of the DFT end point in healthy subjects was 0.84.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a new DFT in acute ON displaying a high specificity of 0.96 and a sensitivity of 0.93. Our study indicates the DFT to be an accurate and easy-to-use tool in diagnosing acute ON, which may be especially helpful in atypical cases.