MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.11.006

Медицинская библиотека · Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society · 2018

Initial misdiagnosis of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease.

Shoughy Samir S, Tabbara Khalid F

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To report the initial misdiagnosis of patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease.

METHODS

The medical records of 76 consecutive patients diagnosed with VKH disease were reviewed retrospectively at The Eye Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients were referred to The Eye Center from Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries. The initial diagnosis was made by an ophthalmologist or neurologist. The main outcome measure was to evaluate cases with VKH disease who were initially misdiagnosed.

RESULTS

In 7 (9.2%) out of the 76 patients the initial diagnosis was incorrect. Patients were initially misdiagnosed as optic neuritis (1.3%), intracranial hypertension (1.3%), brain tumor (1.3%), Susac disease (1.3%), migraine (1.3%), rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (1.3%) or anterior granulomatous uveitis of unknown etiology (1.3%). Patients underwent unnecessary tests including MRI and invasive procedures including CSF analysis and anterior chamber paracentesis.

CONCLUSION

The initial diagnosis of patients with VKH disease was incorrect in 9 % of the cases. Delay in the diagnosis of VKH disease may lead to delay in management and may cause irreversible damage to the photoreceptors with poor visual outcome.

Для цитирования: Shoughy Samir S, Tabbara Khalid F. Initial misdiagnosis of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease.. Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.11.006.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.