MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0080-62342009000300008

Медицинская библиотека · Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2009

[Knowledge of STD/AIDS among adolescent students].

Brêtas José Roberto da Silva, Ohara Conceição Vieira da Silva, Jardim Dulcilene Pereira, Muroya Renata de Lima

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study aims to analyze the degree of knowledge adolescents have on STD/AIDS prevention, transmission, signs, and symptoms, and to contribute with the elaboration of educational actions in the University Extension Program called Corporality and Health Promotion. The research counted on 1,087 adolescents (40% females, 60% males) and was carried out in three elementary and high schools located in the municipality of Embu. A structured, multiple choice questionnaire was applied. Data indicated the achievement of the following results: as per the prevention, 92% of girls and 78% of boys referred to the use of condoms, while 42% of girls and 43% of boys affirmed to wash their genitalia after the sexual relation; 75% females and 52% males quoted television as their source of information. As per the knowledge of STD, girls and boys indicated not to have much information on the issue. Regarding STD healing programs, 57% females and 71% males affirmed not to have any knowledge on the issue; 5% of girls and 6% of boys thought AIDS to be curable. In a general perspective, we can conclude that girls were more familiar with the study's issues than boys.

Для цитирования: Brêtas José Roberto da Silva, Ohara Conceição Vieira da Silva, Jardim Dulcilene Pereira, Muroya Renata de Lima. [Knowledge of STD/AIDS among adolescent students].. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P. 2009. DOI: 10.1590/s0080-62342009000300008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.