Clinical breast cancer · 2024
Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Breast Cancer using Deep Learning with Ultrasound and Mammography: A Multicenter Study.
Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Han Junqi, Hua Hui, Fei Jie, Liu Jingjing, Guo Yijun, Ma Wenjuan, Chen Jingjing
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer morbility and mortality in women. The possibility of overtreatment or inappropriate treatment exists, and methods for evaluating prognosis need to be improved.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (from January 2013 to December 2018) were recruited and divided into a training group and a testing group. All patients were followed for more than 3 years. Patients were divided into a disease-free group and a recurrence group based on follow up results at 3 years. Ultrasound (US) and mammography (MG) images were collected to establish deep learning models (DLMs) using ResNet50. Clinical data, MG, and US characteristics were collected to select independent prognostic factors using a cox proportional hazards model to establish a clinical model. DLM and independent prognostic factors were combined to establish a combined model.
RESULTS: In total, 1242 patients were included. Independent prognostic factors included age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HER2, orientation, blood flow, dubious calcification, and size. We established 5 models: the US DLM, MG DLM, US + MG DLM, clinical and combined model. The combined model using US images, MG images, and pathological, clinical, and radiographic characteristics had the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.882 in the training group, AUC = 0.739 in the testing group).
CONCLUSION: DLMs based on the combination of US, MG, and clinical data have potential as predictive tools for breast cancer prognosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (from January 2013 to December 2018) were recruited and divided into a training group and a testing group. All patients were followed for more than 3 years. Patients were divided into a disease-free group and a recurrence group based on follow up results at 3 years. Ultrasound (US) and mammography (MG) images were collected to establish deep learning models (DLMs) using ResNet50. Clinical data, MG, and US characteristics were collected to select independent prognostic factors using a cox proportional hazards model to establish a clinical model. DLM and independent prognostic factors were combined to establish a combined model.
RESULTS: In total, 1242 patients were included. Independent prognostic factors included age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HER2, orientation, blood flow, dubious calcification, and size. We established 5 models: the US DLM, MG DLM, US + MG DLM, clinical and combined model. The combined model using US images, MG images, and pathological, clinical, and radiographic characteristics had the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.882 in the training group, AUC = 0.739 in the testing group).
CONCLUSION: DLMs based on the combination of US, MG, and clinical data have potential as predictive tools for breast cancer prognosis.