Clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in tuberculosis diagnosis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for tuberculosis (TB).
METHODS
This retrospective study included 52 patients with suspected TB infection. mNGS, targeted PCR, acid-fast staining and, T-SPOT.TB assay were performed on the specimen. The positive rate of mNGS and traditional detection methods was statistically analyzed. Pathological tests were performed when necessary.
RESULTS
In total, 52 patients with suspected of TB in this study were included in the analysis, and 31 patients were finally diagnosed with TB. Among 52 patients, 14 (26.9%) cases were positive for acid-fast staining. The positive rate of T-SPOT.TB assay in 52 patients was 73.1% (38/52). Among 52 patients, 39 (75%) were detected positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) by mNGS. Regarding the detection rate of MTB, mNGS were as high as 75% (39/52), whereas acid-resistant staining was only 26.9% (14/52), which showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). The positive rates of T-SPOT.TB assay and mNGS were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Of the 52 suspected TB patients, 24 had targeted PCR, of which 18 were PCR positive. In 24 patients, the positive rate of PCR was 75%, and the positive rate of mNGS was 100%, with statistical difference between them (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The detection rate of MTB by mNGS was higher than that by conventional acid-fast staining and PCR, but not statistically significant compared with T-SPOT.TB assay. As an adjunctive diagnostic technology, mNGS can be combined with traditional detection methods to play a guiding role in the diagnosis and treatment of TB.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.