DOI 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.08.001
The incidence and sites of Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) metastases on FDG PET/CT scans.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
The only investigation to determine if a whole body FDG PET/CT scan is helpful in the evaluation of NPC is a study from Stanford. In this study, 26 patients with whole body PET/CT, were evaluated for lesions below adrenals and showed that 7.7% of distant metastases were below adrenals. Our study comparing distant metastases below diaphragm with Stanford study to evaluate the need for whole body PET/CT.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Reports of NPC patients in Singapore General Hospital were reviewed. The lesions were analyzed for total number and number below diaphragm. The lesions below the diaphragm were further analyzed if they were solitary or involved multiple areas and if any additional lesions were above diaphragm.
RESULTS
717 reports were included in final analysis. The number of FDG avid lesions in these reports was 709. Distant metastases represented 352 of the 709 lesions. The number of lesions below diaphragm was 152, of the lesions below diaphragm only 16 of lesions have no co-existing distant metastases above diaphragm. From these lesions, there were only 12 solitary lesions. The other 4 has concurrent metastases but all localized below diaphragm.
CONCLUSION
Compared to Stanford study, number of reports is more representative in this study and the yield is much lower (7.7% versus 2.26%). From the results of our study we can consider limiting the scan area from vertex to below diaphragm. However, the symptoms and clinical presentation of the patient will further direct the requesting physician in the area to be imaged.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.