Neurocirugia · 2023
Neurovascular structures in the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus. A computed tomography evaluation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Treviño-Gonzalez Jose Luis, Santos-Santillana Karla Marisol, Maldonado-Chapa Felix, Morales-Del Angel Josefina Alejandra
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Anatomical variations of the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus and its relations with the adjacent neurovascular structures should be preoperatively evaluated to plan an adequate surgical approach and avoid iatrogenic injuries. This study aims to analyze the patterns of pneumatization of the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus and their association with the presence of protrusion and dehiscence of the optic canal, carotid canal, vidian canal, and maxillary nerve.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 320 sphenoid sinuses by computed tomography was performed. Studied variables included type of lateral recess, and protrusion, and dehiscence of the optic and carotid canal, and vidian and maxillary nerve.
RESULTS: The mean age was 45.67±17.43. A total of 55.6% (n=178) of the evaluated sphenoid sinuses corresponded to male subjects. Protrusion of the carotid canal, maxillary nerve, and vidian canal was associated with a type 3 lateral recess pneumatization, while dehiscence of these structures was most commonly observed in a type 2 lateral recess (p=<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Protrusion or dehiscence of neurovascular structures surrounding the sphenoid sinus has been associated with the extent of pneumatization of the lateral recess, increasing the risk of intraoperative injury. Preoperative identification of anatomical variations is mandatory to select the best approach for skull base lesions and avoid iatrogenic injuries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 320 sphenoid sinuses by computed tomography was performed. Studied variables included type of lateral recess, and protrusion, and dehiscence of the optic and carotid canal, and vidian and maxillary nerve.
RESULTS: The mean age was 45.67±17.43. A total of 55.6% (n=178) of the evaluated sphenoid sinuses corresponded to male subjects. Protrusion of the carotid canal, maxillary nerve, and vidian canal was associated with a type 3 lateral recess pneumatization, while dehiscence of these structures was most commonly observed in a type 2 lateral recess (p=<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Protrusion or dehiscence of neurovascular structures surrounding the sphenoid sinus has been associated with the extent of pneumatization of the lateral recess, increasing the risk of intraoperative injury. Preoperative identification of anatomical variations is mandatory to select the best approach for skull base lesions and avoid iatrogenic injuries.